Search Results for "tourism policy"

107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Captain of Ports' Order Changing Zone of Operation for Parasailing Boats — Violation of Natural Justice and Water Sports Policy. Court holds that change of zone without hearing and without valid reasons is arbitrary and contrary to the Water Sports Policy 2020.

The petitioners, owners of parasailing boats, challenged communications dated 19.01.2024 issued by the Captain of Ports (COP) directing them to shift ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Cancellation of Shack Allotment for Violation of Natural Justice. Director of Tourism's Orders Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Grounds and No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given.

The petitioners, Alex J. Fernandes and Agustinho Coutinho, were allotted shacks at Umtawado, Calangute, Goa under the Tourism Policy 2016-2019 after a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Operation of Deccan Odyssey Luxury Train Outside Maharashtra. Court holds that the train was conceived as a national tourism project and its operation outside the state does not violate any statutory or contractual obligation.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Harshad Gawade, an agriculturist and local tour operator, challenging the ...