Search Results for "surplus persons"

405 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 405 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Premium Paid Under ULC Act Government Resolution — Petitioner Cannot Claim Refund After Voluntarily Availing Benefit and Selling Land to Third Parties.

The petitioner, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd., was a beneficiary of an exemption order dated 29 February 1980 under Section 20(1) of the Urban La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Hearing Before Recording Mutation Entry Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Renders Entry Invalid.

The petitioners, Vijaya Vijayrao Khadke and Vijay Sheshraoji Khadke, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging mut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Approval of Staff Appointments in Deaf and Dumb School. Petitioner Trust Failed to Obtain Prior Approval from Government Authorities Before Making Appointments, Violating Government Resolution and Staffing Pattern Requirements.

The petitioner, Maharana Pratap Shikshan Sanstha, a trust running a deaf and dumb school in Sevapur, Latur, filed a writ petition under Articles 226, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Applications in Ceiling Act Case — Purchasers from Surplus Land Owner Not Entitled to Review as No Error Apparent on Record. The court held that purchasers cannot claim better rights than their vendor and that review is not an appeal in disguise.

The judgment concerns two review applications (Miscellaneous Civil Application No.81/1999 and No.86/1999) filed by purchasers of agricultural land fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Dispute Involving Surplus Land and Tenancy Rights. Court upholds Single Judge's order confirming that land was not surplus and appellants were not entitled to restoration of possession under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Bombay Tenancy Act.

The case involves three Letters Patent Appeals arising out of writ petitions decided by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur. The appella...