Search Results for "sue and labour"

99 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 99 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Dismissing Interlocutory Applications. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Seek Certiorari Against Orders Dated 18.06.2025 in Various KID Proceedings.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard and reserved judgment on a batch of writ petitions filed by BDK Valves Private Limited, a company in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case. Court upholds arbitral award allowing contractor's claims for hidden expenses and interest, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Irrigation Department, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons by Judgment Debtor Challenging Execution of Foreign Award. Defendant Contends Hong Kong Labour Tribunal Award Not Executable as Hong Kong Not Reciprocating Territory and Tribunal Not Superior Court Under Section 44A of CPC.

The matter arose from an execution application filed by Kevin George Vaz seeking to enforce an award dated 6th August 2004 passed by the Labour Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Under Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act. Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Invoking Section 33C(2) and Cannot Be Decided as Incidental Issue.

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitio...