Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Continue Suit for Declaration as Dai Al-Mutlaq After Plaintiff's Death — Suit for Personal Status Abates Under Order 22 Rule 1 CPC. The court held that a suit for declaration of personal status is not heritable and cannot be continued by a legal representative claiming a derivative title.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The original plaintiff, Khuzemabhai, filed a suit seeking a declaration that he was validly appointed as the 53rd Dai Al-Mutlaq (spiritual leader) of the Dawoodi Bohra community by the 52nd Dai, Syedna Mohammad Burhanuddin. The defendant, Mufaddal Burhanuddin, claimed to have been appointed as the successor by the same 52nd Dai and assumed office after his death on 17 January 2014. The suit was filed in 2014, and after some proceedings, the plaintiff died on 30 March 2016 in America. His eldest son, Taher Fakhruddin, filed a Chamber Summons seeking to continue the suit, claiming that his father had appointed him as the 54th Dai Al-Mutlaq. The legal issue was whether the suit abated on the death of the plaintiff, being a suit for personal status. The court held that the suit was for a declaration of personal status and rights entirely personal to the plaintiff, and therefore abated under Order 22 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The applicant's claim to be the successor was a distinct and independent right, and he could not continue the suit. The Chamber Summons was dismissed, and the suit was dismissed as abated. The court noted that the applicant could file a fresh suit if he wished to assert his own rights.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Abatement of Suit - Personal Status - Suit for declaration of appointment as spiritual leader (Dai Al-Mutlaq) is a suit for personal status and rights entirely personal to the plaintiff - Under Order 22 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, such a suit abates on the death of the plaintiff - The right to sue is not heritable and cannot be continued by a legal representative claiming a derivative title (Paras 1-5, 10-15).

B) Civil Procedure - Legal Representative - Right to Continue Suit - The applicant, claiming to be the 54th Dai Al-Mutlaq, cannot continue the suit filed by his father for a declaration of his own appointment - The suit was for a declaration of the father's personal status, and the applicant's claim is distinct and independent - The applicant must file a fresh suit if he wishes to assert his own rights (Paras 16-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a suit seeking a declaration that the plaintiff was validly appointed as the 53rd Dai Al-Mutlaq of the Dawoodi Bohra community is a suit for personal status that abates on the death of the plaintiff, and whether the applicant, claiming to be the successor, can continue the suit.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Chamber Summons dismissed. Suit dismissed as abated. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Suit for declaration of personal status abates on death of plaintiff
  • Order 22 Rule 1 CPC
  • Right to sue is personal
  • No right to continue by legal representative claiming derivative title
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (03) 26

Chamber Summons No. 1290 of 2016 in Suit No. 337 of 2014

2017-03-07

G.S. Patel, J

Mr RM Kadam, Senior Advocate, with Mr Anand Desai, Mr Chirag Mody, Mr Samit Shukla & Mr Sausher Kohli, i/b DSK Legal (for Applicant); Mr JD Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate, with Mr Pankaj Sawant, Senior Advocate, Mr Firdosh Pooniwalla, Mr Juzer Shakir, Ms Azmin Irani, Mr Abeezar Fazullabhoy, Mr Murtuza Kachwalla & Mr Shehen Pradhan, i/b HSA Advocates (for Defendant)

Taher Fakhruddin Saheb alias Taherbhai K Qutubuddin alias Taherbhai Qutubuddin

Mufaddal Burhanuddin Saifuddin

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for declaration of personal status as spiritual leader and for consequential reliefs regarding properties.

Remedy Sought

Applicant seeks to continue the suit filed by his deceased father, claiming to be the successor as Dai Al-Mutlaq.

Filing Reason

The original plaintiff died during the pendency of the suit, and his son seeks to continue the suit in his own name.

Previous Decisions

The suit was filed in 2014; the plaintiff died on 30 March 2016; the Chamber Summons was filed to continue the suit.

Issues

Whether the suit for declaration of appointment as Dai Al-Mutlaq is a suit for personal status that abates on the death of the plaintiff. Whether the applicant, claiming to be the successor, can continue the suit.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the suit does not abate as it involves property rights and the right to sue survives. Defendant argued that the suit is for personal status and abates on the death of the plaintiff.

Ratio Decidendi

A suit for declaration of personal status and rights entirely personal to the plaintiff abates on the death of the plaintiff under Order 22 Rule 1 CPC. The right to sue is not heritable, and a legal representative claiming a derivative title cannot continue the suit.

Judgment Excerpts

The question before me today in this Chamber Summons is whether the suit Khuzemabhai filed was for a declaration of a personal status and rights entirely personal to him; if so, whether this suit abated on his death; if not, whether Taher Fakhruddin can continue the suit in his own name, amending it for a suitable declaration in his own favour.

Procedural History

Suit No. 337 of 2014 filed by Khuzemabhai for declaration as 53rd Dai Al-Mutlaq. Plaintiff died on 30 March 2016. Chamber Summons No. 1290 of 2016 filed by Taher Fakhruddin to continue the suit. Heard on 7 March 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 22 Rule 1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Continue Suit for Declaration as Dai Al-Mutlaq After Plaintiff's Death — Suit for Personal Status Abates Under Order 22 Rule 1 CPC. The court held that a suit for declaration of personal status is not heri...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Trust Dispute. Application under Section 41D of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 for removal of trustees dismissed as not maintainable due to lack of compliance with statu...