Search Results for "structurals"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Predeposit Order in Central Excise Case — Prima Facie Case for Total Waiver Established. Structural glazing, once erected, becomes immovable property and is not excisable under Heading 76.10 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

The appellant, MS Alumayer India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in fabrication and erection of structural glazing. They purchase aluminum angles/profiles, glas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Levy of Excise Duty on Fabrication and Construction of Structurals - Activities Do Not Amount to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Fabrication at site results in immovable property, not excisable goods.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. and Ceat Tyres of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Price Adjustment Dispute Under World Bank-Financed Contract. Court Upholds Majority Award's Interpretation of Price Adjustment Clause but Modifies Interest Rate from 18% to 12%.

The petitioner, M/s. Angerlehner Structurals & Civil Engineering Co., was awarded a contract by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MMC) for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Deferral of Prosecution Authorisation Under Section 34 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Government Can Defer Consideration of Prosecution Authorisation Pending Adjudication of Underlying Industrial Dispute Under Section 10 of the Act.

The petitioner, M/S International Trimmings and Labels India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute. Court Allows Appointment of Receiver to Secure Hypothecated Assets Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed three applications before the Madras High Court: Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute Over Hypothecated Assets. Court allows appointment of Receiver under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to preserve assets pending arbitration.

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...