Search Results for "striking off defence"

97 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Striking Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement. Non-compliance with interim orders under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 leads to striking off defence under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 4 October 2012, which allowed a motion under Order 39 Rule 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Tenants' Appeal in Rent Control Case — Striking Out Defence Not Automatic Under Section 15(7) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Discretionary Power Must Be Exercised Judiciously; Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Justify Striking Out Defence.

The case involves an appeal by tenants against the High Court of Delhi's order upholding the Rent Controller's decision to strike out their defence in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Striking Out of Defence for Non-Payment of Interim Maintenance in DV Act Case. Failure to Pay Maintenance Justifies Coercive Measure Under Section 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Girish Vijaysingh Pardeshi, challenged an order dated 31/03/2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. 7, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms Interim Maintenance for Wife and Son in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Frames Guidelines on Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and Other Enactments to Ensure Uniformity and Consistency.

The case arises from an application for interim maintenance filed by the wife and minor son under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The wife left the matrimonial ho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Striking Off Wife's Defence for Breach of Access Order in Divorce Proceedings. Family Court's Power Under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Includes Striking Off Defence for Non-Compliance with Interim Orders.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the wife, Mrs. Vimi Vinod Chopra, challenging the order of the Family Court No. 4, Mumbai dated 13.10.2010,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cadila Pharmaceuticals in Passing Off Action by Medley Laboratories. Marks 'HB TONE' and 'RB TONE' Held Deceptively Similar for Pharmaceutical Products, Injunction Confirmed.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellant (original defendant) for infringement and passing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Striking Off Defence for Non-Payment of Maintenance in Family Court Proceedings. Failure to Pay Interim Maintenance Under Section 18 of Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act, 1956 Justifies Striking Off Defence Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC.

The petitioner-husband and respondent-wife married on 3.5.1983. Marital discord led to multiple proceedings: the wife filed for divorce under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Article 227 Cannot Override Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Supreme Court Restores Plaint Wrongly Struck Off by High Court (2026 INSC 121)

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in striking off the plaint under Article 227 of the Constitution when a specific remedy under Order V...