Search Results for "section 86(5)"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Returned Candidate; Upholds High Court's Decision Setting Aside Election for Corrupt Practice. Speech Threatening Divine Displeasure for Voting Deemed Undue Influence Under Section 123(2) Proviso (a)(ii) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

Background: The case concerns an election petition filed by an elector challenging the election of the Swatantra Party candidate from the Banaskantha ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes LAO's Apportionment Order in Highway Acquisition — Directs Reference to Civil Court Under Section 19C(4) of Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Dispute over compensation apportionment between partnership firm and its individual partners requires adjudication by civil court, not LAO.

The petitioners, Pravin Girish Chamaria and Nishit Bechar Patel, along with respondents 4 and 5 (Dilip Prabhakar Kudalkar and Jagdish Shashikumar Raje...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010137812018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010138832018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Power to Levy Interest Under Section 234B When No Interest Was Charged in Original Assessment. Interest under Section 234B(4) can only be increased or reduced if it was initially chargeable under the original assessment order.

The petitioner, Akbar Travels of India Pvt. Ltd., an IATA approved travel agent and money changer, filed returns for Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2006-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disciplinary Penalty Against Executive Engineer for Negligence in Rate Justification. Reduction in pay by one stage for one year with cumulative effect confirmed as proportionate penalty under Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965.

The petitioner, Shri B.M. Mittal, an Executive Engineer, challenged the judgment and order dated 30.9.2004 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010124482018_1

...