High Court of Bombay Upholds Facilitation Council Award for Interest on Delayed Payments Under MSMED Act — Limitation Period for Reference Not Applicable. The court held that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is a complete code and the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to references made under Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 169
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and others, successors of the erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), challenged an award passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Konkan Division, Thane under Section 18(3) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act). The respondent, M/s Deltron Electronics, a small scale enterprise registered under the MSMED Act, had supplied transformers against purchase orders placed between 1 August 1994 and 10 October 2000. The contract stipulated payment within 60 days from receipt of materials. The respondent supplied materials and received payment for the principal amounts but later, by letter dated 9 June 2004, claimed interest on delayed payments totaling Rs.83,54,695/-. The petitioners refused to pay. On 21 September 2005, the respondent filed a reference before the Industries Facilitation Council under the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993, which was later deemed to be under the MSMED Act. The council awarded interest. The petitioners challenged the award on the ground that the reference was barred by limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963. The court considered whether the Limitation Act applies to references under Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act. The court held that the MSMED Act is a complete code and the Limitation Act does not apply, as the Act provides its own limitation period of three years from the date of cause of action under Section 24 read with Section 18(3). The court found that the reference was filed within three years from the date of the respondent's letter claiming interest (9 June 2004) and thus was not barred. The court dismissed the petition and upheld the award.

Headnote

A) Limitation Act - Applicability to MSMED Act - Section 18(3) Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 - The court considered whether the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to references under Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act. The court held that the MSMED Act is a complete code and the Limitation Act does not apply to such references, as the Act provides its own limitation period of three years from the date of cause of action under Section 24 read with Section 18(3). (Paras 4-10)

B) Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act - Interest on Delayed Payments - Section 15, 16, 18(3) - The respondent claimed interest on delayed payments for supplies made between 1994 and 2000. The Facilitation Council awarded interest. The court upheld the award, finding that the claim was not barred by limitation and that the council had jurisdiction. (Paras 2-3, 11-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reference filed by the respondent under Section 18(3) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 was barred by limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the arbitration petition and upheld the award of the Facilitation Council, holding that the reference was not barred by limitation.

Law Points

  • Interest on delayed payments
  • Limitation Act not applicable to MSMED Act references
  • Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council jurisdiction
  • Complete code principle
  • Section 18(3) MSMED Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (11) 61

Arbitration Petition (L) No.2464 of 2015 with Notice of Motion (L) No.3696 of 2015 and Notice of Motion (L) No.15 of 2016 and Notice of Motion (L) No.14 of 2016

2016-11-15

S.C. Gupte, J.

2016:BHC-OS:15886

Mr. Gaurav Joshi, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Neeta Jain, Nirav Shah And Anuj Jaiswal i/b Little & Co., for the Petitioners. Mr. Suresh Dhole a/w Pushpa Shinde for the Respondent.

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and Others

M/s Deltron Electronics

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to an award passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council under Section 18(3) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought to set aside the award of the Facilitation Council on the ground that the reference was barred by limitation.

Filing Reason

The respondent claimed interest on delayed payments for supplies made between 1994 and 2000, which the petitioners refused to pay.

Previous Decisions

The Facilitation Council awarded interest in favor of the respondent.

Issues

Whether the reference filed by the respondent under Section 18(3) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 was barred by limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the reference was barred by limitation as the cause of action arose between 1994 and 2000, and the reference was filed in 2005, beyond the three-year period under the Limitation Act. The respondent argued that the MSMED Act is a complete code and the Limitation Act does not apply, and the reference was within the period prescribed under Section 24 of the MSMED Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is a complete code and the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to references under Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act. The limitation period for such references is governed by Section 24 of the MSMED Act, which provides a period of three years from the date of cause of action.

Judgment Excerpts

This Arbitration Petition challenges an award passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Konkan Division, Thane under Section 18(3) of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. The court held that the MSMED Act is a complete code and the Limitation Act does not apply to such references.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a reference before the Industries Facilitation Council on 21 September 2005 under the Interest on Delayed Payments Act, 1993. The council awarded interest. The petitioners filed an arbitration petition challenging the award. The petition was admitted and taken up for final hearing by consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006: Section 18(3), Section 15, Section 16, Section 24
  • Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993:
  • Limitation Act, 1963:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal and Writ Petition in Food Adulteration Case Concerning Scented Supari Containing Saccharin and Cyclamate. Court Upholds Conviction and Six-Month Minimum Sentence, Holding Supari Is Food and Rules 44(g) and 47 Are Valid ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Discriminatory Cut-off Date in Pension Revision for Pre-1996 Retired Judicial Officers. Government Resolution Denying Revised Pension to Pre-1996 Retirees Violates Article 14 of the Constitution.