Search Results for "section 13(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "section 13(2)"

1527 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1527 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Adulterated Milk in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case — Marginal Deficiency in Milk Solids Non-Fat Not Excusable. The Court held that prescribed standards under the Act must be strictly followed and even marginal deviation constitutes adulteration.

13 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Raj Kumar, who was convicted under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated mil...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Misbranded Food Case Due to Denial of Right to Re-test Sample Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The court held that the right to get a sample analysed by the Central Food Laboratory applies to misbranded food articles and denial of this right due to prosecution's negligence vitiates proceedings.

29 Nov 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissing the appellant's application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Vendor in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules and Lack of Valid Consent. Failure to Send Sample to Central Food Laboratory Despite Request and Non-Production of Consent Order Under Section 20 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

9 Feb 2015

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Shantilal Bansilal Bhandari, the proprietor of a kirana store in Nanded, challenging his...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Legal Heirs of Borrower. Court Holds That Legal Heirs Are Bound by Mortgage and Cannot Challenge Section 13(2) Notice After Delay and Without Availing Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of Smt. Sudha Avdhut Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the proceedings initiated by the Central Bank of India unde...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Nominal Sale Deed and Bank's Securitization Proceedings. Civil Court's jurisdiction barred under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for challenging bank's attachment notice under Section 13(2).

24 Apr 2014

The appellants, Smt. Savita Bhagwantrao Patil and Chaitanya Bhagwantrao Patil, were the original plaintiffs in a suit filed before the 6th Joint Civil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Act Proceedings Against Guarantors — Guarantors Not Entitled to Pre-Deposit Under Section 17(2) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. The court held that a guarantor is a borrower under Section 2(1)(f) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and can be proceeded against under Section 13(2), but the pre-deposit requirement under Section 17(2) does not apply to guarantors.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by members of the Shegur family against Vikas Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Bank of Maharashtra. The peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Securitisation Act Notice Against Tenant in Possession of Mortgaged Property. Petitioner failed to establish independent right or title over the secured asset, and the notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 was validly served.

20 Mar 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Ms. Yukta Mookhey against the Bank of India and others. The background is that Harmonics Fabrics Fashions L...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Revision Petitioner in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

24 Jun 2022

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by M. Ajithkumar, the proprietor of Swasthik Trading Company, challenging his conviction under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Seller and Manufacturer in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Failure to Send Sample to Director of Central Food Laboratory Renders Public Analyst Report Inadmissible.

8 Apr 2011

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Maharashtra Government through the Food Inspector against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 14.3.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 14 and Section 13(2) of PFA Act. Benefit of Doubt Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Proper Stirring of Oil Sample and Timely Intimation of Right to Get Sample Analyzed.

24 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment dated 27-11-2002 in Regular Cr...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)