Search Results for "secondary evidence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "secondary evidence"

601 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 601 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

24 Aug 2023

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Requiring Application for Secondary Evidence — Reiterates That No Prior Permission Is Needed Under Evidence Act, 1872. The court held that a party seeking to lead secondary evidence must do so before the judge recording evidence, and no application for permission is maintainable.

3 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Karthik Gangadhar Bhat, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the trial court that required him t...

Supreme Court

Secondary Evidence and Power of Attorney in Property Transactions: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 65 Evidence Act and Section 100 CPC i

6 Feb 2026

n Tharammel Peethambaran v. T. Ushakrishnan, the dispute arose from the sale of immovable property executed by the defendant acting as an alleged agen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Assistant Teacher Seeking Retirement at 60 Years Under Government Resolution. Government Resolution dated 27th October 1994 Raising Retirement Age to 60 Years Does Not Apply to Zilla Parishad Employees as They Are Not Government Servants.

3 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Shaligram Laxman Wakate, was an Assistant Teacher in a Zilla Parishad School in Warodi, Akola. He was born on 17th July 1938 and appoi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secondary Evidence of Will in Land Dispute Case — Foundational Requirements Under Sections 65 and 66 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Satisfied. The Court held that existence of original document need not be proved at threshold for admission of secondary evidence under Section 65(a) when notice under Section 66 has been served and document not produced.

4 Mar 2020

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by Jagmail Singh and another (appellants) seeking a declaration of ownership over land owned by Babu Singh, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Secondary Evidence of Will in Civil Suit. The court held that the trial court's discretion to allow secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No.126/2006, challenged the order dated 20th July 2015 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Sen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Reference in Corruption Case: Demand Must Be Proved by Direct or Circumstantial Evidence, Not Mere Recovery. Proof of demand is sine qua non for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and presumption under Section 20 arises only after demand is established.

15 Dec 2022

This reference to a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court arose from a conflict between three-judge bench decisions regarding the proof of demand of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Challenge to Promotion of Another Teacher as Headmaster in MEPS Act Case — Seniority and Qualifications Not Decisive Where Management's Discretion Upheld. The court held that the School Tribunal's findings were based on evidence and not perverse, and that the management's discretion in promotion cannot be interfered with under writ jurisdiction.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Pushpanjali Subodha Shenvi, was appointed as an assistant teacher in Ganesh Vidya Mandir, a private aided secondary school run by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Teacher in Primary School Termination Case — MEPS Act Applies to Primary Schools Recognized Under Bombay Primary Education Act. School Tribunal Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Appeal Under Section 9 of MEPS Act, 1977.

9 Jun 2011

The case involves an appeal by Smt. Komal Rugwani, an assistant teacher at Jhulelal Trust School, a private primary school recognized by the Ulhasnaga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Claim Over Domain Name 'secondshaadi.com' — Finds 'Shaadi' Generic and Descriptive. Plaintiff's mark 'Shaadi.com' lacks distinctiveness for exclusive use; no likelihood of confusion as 'secondshaadi' denotes a different service.

14 Sep 2016

The Plaintiff, People Interactive (India) Private Limited, owner of the well-known matrimonial website 'Shaadi.com', filed a suit against Vivek Pahwa ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)