Search Results for "pick and choose"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "pick and choose"

322 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of PTI Selection by Haryana Staff Selection Commission Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. The selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as the Commission altered the marking scheme after interviews without any rational basis.

1 Jan 2020

The case pertains to a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which quashed the selection of Physical T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Condition Requiring Prior MIDC Experience in Power Supply Tender. Condition Held Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

29 Apr 2014

The petitioner, Royal Power Turnkey Implements Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, challenged a tender notice issued by the Maharashtra Industrial D...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Land Allotment Policy for Cooperative Societies in Andhra Pradesh — Violation of Article 14 and Lack of Transparency. Preferential allotment of government land at basic rates to MPs, MLAs, Judges, AIS officers, and journalists held arbitrary and unconstitutional.

13 Dec 2024

The case involves cross appeals against a Division Bench judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 05.01.2010, which partly allowed writ petitio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Judgment in Teacher Appointment Case Due to Arbitrary Denial of Marks but Denies Appointment as School Closed. The Court Held That Discretionary Clauses in Recruitment Cannot Justify Arbitrary Action and That Adding Specialization Requirements to Prescribed Qualifications is Illegal, but Remedy Was Unavailable Due to Subsequent Closure of the Institution.

20 Feb 2024

The appeal arose from a dispute over the appointment of a primary school teacher at Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya Institute for the Physically Handicapped. ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Conditions for Dialysis Centres — No Malafides or Arbitrariness Found in Eligibility Criteria. The court held that tender conditions are within the government's domain and not subject to judicial interference unless arbitrary or discriminatory.

5 Mar 2020

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Dr. R. Venkatesh challenging tender notifications issued by the State of Goa for establishing dia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MSEDCL Tender Process for Composite Power Procurement. Court holds that tender conditions requiring composite bids for thermal and solar power are valid and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

26 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Rajesh Sharma, the General Secretary of the Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decrees Suit in Favour of Financial Advisor in Commercial Summary Suit for Professional Fees — Interpretation of Mandate Letter Options for Success Fee on Cash Sales of NPAs. Court holds that where the Bank exercised option of 100% cash sales, the Financial Advisor is entitled to success fee at the higher rate of 0.50% on cash received, as per option (a) of the Mandate Letter dated 1 July 2017.

25 Feb 2025

The Plaintiff, Special Situation Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in providing financial adviso...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of GPSC Recommendations for Junior Scale Officer Posts. The Court Examined Whether the Cabinet Decision Was Arbitrary and Violative of Constitutional Guarantees.

21 Dec 2012

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging a Cabinet decision of the Government of Goa. The dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blacklisting by Railways — Violation of Natural Justice and Unreasoned Order. The court set aside the blacklisting order for being arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice.

10 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Apar Industries Ltd., a major supplier of Over Head Equipment to the Indian Railways, challenged a blacklisting order passed by the Ra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Municipal Construction Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration Act — Respondent Forfeits Right to Appoint by Delay. The Court held that the ineligibility under Section 12(5) read with Seventh Schedule can be waived, and the Respondent forfeited its right to appoint an arbitrator by failing to act within the prescribed time.

27 Jan 2023

The Petitioner, PSP Projects Limited, a construction company, was awarded a contract by the Respondent, Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation, ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)