Search Results for "occupational hazard"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "occupational hazard"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Expert Appraisal Committee to Revisit Environmental Clearance for Greenfield Airport at Mopa, Goa, Balancing Development and Biodiversity Concerns in Western Ghats. The Court suspends the environmental clearance pending fresh appraisal by the EAC, emphasizing the need to preserve forests, ecologically sensitive areas, and water channels.

23 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court of India was hearing a Miscellaneous Application filed by the Union of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (M...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Injured Construction Worker in Employees Compensation Case, Enhancing Compensation for Permanent Partial Disability. Loss of earning capacity assessed at 100% for her occupation, notional income enhanced to Rs.12,000 per month under Section 4(1)(b) of Employees Compensation Act, 1923.

9 Dec 2022

The appellant, Chandramma, was a construction labourer engaged in the construction of a government hospital at Bidar, Karnataka. On 22 July 2015, whil...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Fire Caused by Theft Covered Under Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy. The Court held that the proximate cause of the fire was the theft, which is a covered peril, and the exclusion for 'burning by order of any Public Authority' does not apply.

1 Jan 2025

The appellant, Cement Corporation of India, a government company, invited tenders for insurance in June 2005. The respondent, ICICI Lombard General In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Criminal Intent. Complaint under Section 338 IPC fails as essential ingredients of grievous hurt by rash or negligent act not established without expert evidence.

20 Aug 2019

The petitioner, a practicing ophthalmologist, challenged the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, which upheld the Magistrate's order issu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurance Claim in Consumer Dispute Over Deterioration of Stock Policy. Claim Rejected as Insured's Admission of Proper Temperature Maintenance Triggered Policy Exceptions Excluding Liability if Temperature Did Not Exceed 4.4°C.

24 Jan 2022

The appeal originated from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dated 14 August 2018 in Consumer Case No 37 of 2010. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mediclaim Policy Renewal Dispute — Insurer Must Disclose Material Changes in Coverage at Renewal. Renewal of Insurance Policy is Not a Fresh Contract; Insurer Owed Duty to Inform Insured of Restrictive Terms Under Principle of Utmost Good Faith.

9 Dec 2021

The appellants, Jacob Punnen and his wife, held a Mediclaim policy with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. since 1982, renewed annually. In March 2008, t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revisional Order Restoring Complaint in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion Under Section 155(2) of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Renders Complaint Not Maintainable. The court held that the mandatory requirement of obtaining expert opinion before taking cognizance of medical negligence cannot be dispensed with, and the Revisional Court erred in restoring the complaint without considering this provision.

2 Mar 2021

The petitioners, Manipal Hospital and Dr. Shankar Kumar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctors in Medical Negligence Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Section 304A IPC. Allegations of Rash or Negligent Act Not Made Out as Treatment Was Given in Good Faith and No Gross Negligence Established.

6 Jul 2017

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard two criminal applications filed by Dr. Pradeep Sadashiv Wankhede and Dr. Abhishek Vasantrao Sondawale, bot...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — No Prima Facie Case of Rash or Negligent Act Under Section 304A IPC. The court held that mere negligence or error of judgment does not constitute criminal negligence; there must be gross lack of competence or recklessness.

5 Oct 2005

The applicant, Dr. Sujoy Das, a part-time General Surgeon at ESI Hospital in Margao, Goa, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)