Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctors in Medical Negligence Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Section 304A IPC. Allegations of Rash or Negligent Act Not Made Out as Treatment Was Given in Good Faith and No Gross Negligence Established.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard two criminal applications filed by Dr. Pradeep Sadashiv Wankhede and Dr. Abhishek Vasantrao Sondawale, both medical practitioners, seeking quashing of FIR No. 160/2016 registered at Police Station Lakadganj, Nagpur. The FIR was lodged by respondent no. 2, Boni Uttam Walde, alleging medical negligence leading to the death of his newborn child. The child was born on 5 December 2015 and was admitted to various hospitals for treatment between 30 December 2015 and 10 January 2016. On 12 January 2016, the child was taken to Dr. Jaiswal's hospital where the applicants examined the child and prescribed medicine, advising the complainant to take the child home. Later that morning, the child's condition deteriorated and he was taken to a Child Specialist, but died. The complainant alleged that the applicants' negligence caused the death. The applicants argued that they treated the child in good faith and there was no evidence of criminal negligence. The court examined the FIR and found that the allegations did not make out a prima facie case under Section 304A IPC as there was no material to show that the doctors acted rashly or negligently. The court noted that the doctors had examined the child and prescribed medicine, and there was no indication of gross negligence. The court also considered that the child had been treated by multiple doctors and had a history of health issues. The court held that continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law and quashed the FIR against both applicants.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - FIR registered under Sections 304A, 338, 337 IPC against doctors for alleged medical negligence - Court held that where allegations do not make out a prima facie case of rash or negligent act, FIR is liable to be quashed - Held that treatment was given in good faith and no gross negligence was established (Paras 2-10).

B) Indian Penal Code - Medical Negligence - Section 304A IPC - Rash or Negligent Act - Death of child due to alleged medical negligence - Court found that doctors acted in good faith and there was no material to show that they acted with criminal negligence - Held that mere allegation of negligence without evidence of gross negligence does not attract Section 304A (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR against the doctors for alleged medical negligence resulting in death of a child should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC for lack of prima facie case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both criminal applications are allowed. FIR No. 160/2016 registered at Police Station Lakadganj, Nagpur is quashed against both applicants.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Medical negligence
  • Section 304A IPC
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Good faith treatment
  • No prima facie case
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 187

Criminal Application (APL) No. 503 of 2016 and Criminal Application (APL) No. 505 of 2016

2017-07-06

Prasanna B. Varale, M. G. Giratkar

Shri R. M. Daga, Shri Rohan Malviya, Shri J. Y. Ghurde, Shri J. P. Junghare

Dr. Pradeep s/o Sadashiv Wankhede and Dr. Abhishek s/o Vasantrao Sondawale

The State of Maharashtra and Boni s/o Uttam Walde

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal applications for quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 160/2016 registered at Police Station Lakadganj, Nagpur

Filing Reason

Alleged medical negligence leading to death of a child

Issues

Whether the FIR against the doctors for alleged medical negligence should be quashed for lack of prima facie case.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that they treated the child in good faith and there was no criminal negligence. Respondent no. 2 alleged that the doctors' negligence caused the child's death.

Ratio Decidendi

Where allegations in FIR do not make out a prima facie case of rash or negligent act under Section 304A IPC, and the doctors acted in good faith, the FIR is liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process of law.

Judgment Excerpts

Both the applications are filed by the Doctors for quashing of First Information Report registered vide Crime No. 160/2016 by Police Station, Lakadganj, Nagpur. The court found that the allegations do not make out a prima facie case under Section 304A IPC.

Procedural History

FIR registered on 16/05/2016. Applicants filed Criminal Applications (APL) No. 503/2016 and 505/2016 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing. Heard on 06/07/2017 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 304A, 338, 337
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctors in Medical Negligence Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Section 304A IPC. Allegations of Rash or Negligent Act Not Made Out as Treatment Was Given in Good Faith and No Gross Negligence Established.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Promotion with Retrospective Effect in Air India Corporation Case. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to promotion or that the Respondent acted arbitrarily in not promoting him.