Search Results for "no development zone"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds CRZ Violations in Maradu Municipality Construction Case — Coastal Zone Management Authority's Powers Affirmed. Construction in CRZ-III No Development Zone Without Prior Concurrence of Authority Violates Environment Protection Act, 1986 and CRZ Notification 1991.

The appeals were filed by the Kerala State Coastal Zone Management Authority (KCZMA) against the judgment of the Kerala High Court which had allowed w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Resort Developer Against Prohibition of Construction in Backwater Island. CRZ Notification 1991 Applies to Backwater Islands; No Development Zone Restrictions Upheld.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Kapico Kerala Resorts Pvt. Ltd. challenging a Kerala High Court order that prohibited resort construction on Ne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Against Encroachment on CIDCO Land by Minister's Relative. Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Glass House Construction in No Development Zone and Coastal Regulation Zone.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, a resident of Navi Mumbai and Vice President of a multinational company, filed a Public Interest Litigat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Illegal Construction in CRZ Area. Petitioner failed to produce any valid permission or documents to justify construction within No Development Zone under CRZ Notification 1991.

The petitioner, Shri David D'Souza, purchased a property at Anjuna, Goa in 2001. He constructed a residential house of about 70 sq.mts within 200 m of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Upon Legality of Hotel Construction in Coastal Regulation Zone III Area Without Mandatory Ministry Approval. Developers Allegedly Built in No Development Zone Without Necessary MEF Clearance Despite CRZ Notification Requiring Prior Approval.

Background: The petitioners, two public interest organizations, filed writ petitions challenging the construction of a hotel in Goa by respondent nos....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard PIL Challenging Development Permissions for Star Hotel in No Development Zone. The Court Considered Whether UDD Approval Under Regulation 59(3) and Additional FSI of 1.0 Were Valid Under DCRs and MRTP Act.

The case arose from a public interest litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. T...