Supreme Court Upholds CRZ Violations in Maradu Municipality Construction Case — Coastal Zone Management Authority's Powers Affirmed. Construction in CRZ-III No Development Zone Without Prior Concurrence of Authority Violates Environment Protection Act, 1986 and CRZ Notification 1991.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals were filed by the Kerala State Coastal Zone Management Authority (KCZMA) against the judgment of the Kerala High Court which had allowed writ petitions challenging show cause notices for cancellation of building permits. The respondent builders had constructed buildings on the shores of backwaters in Ernakulam, which is part of a tidally influenced water body and a large wetland. The KCZMA contended that the area was notified as CRZ-III under the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification 1991, where no construction is permitted within 200 meters of the High Tide Line. The High Court had held that the permit holders could not be penalized for the failure of local authorities. The Supreme Court, after hearing the parties, constituted a three-member committee to determine the CRZ category of the area. The committee reported that as per the Coastal Zone Management Plan (CZMP) of 1996, Maradu was marked as a panchayat area and fell under CRZ-III. Although Maradu was upgraded to a municipality in 2010, the CZMP 1996 remained valid until the new draft CZMP was approved. The committee concluded that the area was CRZ-III and the constructions were in the prohibited zone. The Supreme Court accepted the committee's report and held that the constructions were in violation of the CRZ Notification 1991. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment and restored the show cause notices, directing the authorities to proceed in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Environment Law - Coastal Regulation Zone - CRZ-III No Development Zone - CRZ Notification 1991, Environment Protection Act, 1986 - Construction in CRZ-III area within 200 meters of High Tide Line is prohibited except for repairs of authorized structures - The Committee found that Maradu area was CRZ-III as per CZMP 1996, and constructions were in prohibited zone - Held that the show cause notice for cancellation of permits was justified (Paras 1-8).

B) Environment Law - Coastal Zone Management Plan - Validity of CZMP 1996 - CRZ Notification 2011 - Until new CZMP is approved, CZMP 1996 remains valid - Maradu upgraded to municipality in 2010 but CZMP 1996 still applicable - Held that the area falls under CRZ-III (Paras 5-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the construction activities carried out by the respondents in Maradu Municipality fall within CRZ-III and are in violation of the CRZ Notification 1991, and whether the show cause notice for cancellation of building permits was valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court and restored the show cause notices. The authorities were directed to proceed in accordance with law, taking into account the committee's report that the area falls in CRZ-III and constructions are in the prohibited zone.

Law Points

  • CRZ Notification 1991
  • Environment Protection Act
  • 1986
  • Coastal Zone Management Plan 1996
  • Kerala Municipality Building Rules
  • 1999
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (5) 82

Civil Appeal Nos.4784-4785 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.4227-4228 of 2016) and connected appeals

2019-05-08

The Kerala State Coastal Zone Management Authority

The State of Kerala Maradu Municipality & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeals against High Court judgment allowing writ petitions challenging show cause notices for cancellation of building permits in CRZ area.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (KCZMA) sought to set aside the High Court judgment and uphold the show cause notices for cancellation of building permits.

Filing Reason

The appellant alleged that construction activities were carried out in CRZ-III area without prior concurrence, in violation of CRZ Notification 1991 and Environment Protection Act, 1986.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions; the Division Bench dismissed the appeals; review petitions were dismissed.

Issues

Whether the construction activities fall within CRZ-III and are in violation of CRZ Notification 1991? Whether the show cause notice for cancellation of building permits was valid?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant: The area is CRZ-III as per CZMP 1996; constructions are in prohibited zone; High Court ignored approved CZMP. Respondents: The area is CRZ-II; permit holders cannot be penalized for failure of local authorities.

Ratio Decidendi

The Coastal Zone Management Plan (CZMP) of 1996 is valid until a new plan is approved. As per CZMP 1996, Maradu area is CRZ-III, where no construction is permitted within 200 meters of High Tide Line. The show cause notice for cancellation of building permits was justified as the constructions were in violation of CRZ Notification 1991.

Judgment Excerpts

The area up to 200 meters from the High Tide Line is to be earmarked as 'No Development Zone'. No construction shall be permitted within this zone except for repairs of existing authorised structures not exceeding existing FSI, existing plinth area, and existing density. The Coastal Zone Management Plan (CZMP) of Kerala currently applicable is the one that was approved in 1996. As per the said CZMP Maradu has been marked as Panchayat area and hence falls in the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) category of CRZ III.

Procedural History

The Vigilance Section of Local Self Government Department issued show cause notices under Rule 16 of Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999. Writ petitions were filed in the High Court challenging the notices. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions. The Division Bench dismissed the appeals. Review petitions were dismissed. The appellant then filed special leave petitions in the Supreme Court, which were converted into civil appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Environment Protection Act, 1986: Section 3
  • Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999: Rules 16, 23
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds CRZ Violations in Maradu Municipality Construction Case — Coastal Zone Management Authority's Powers Affirmed. Construction in CRZ-III No Development Zone Without Prior Concurrence of Authority Violates Environment Protection ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Management in Industrial Dispute Over Fraudulent Appointments Under Employment Exchange Act. Termination of 38 workmen justified as their names were absent from Employment Exchange sponsored lists and they took contradictory sta...