Search Results for "naval employee"

39 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Artisan Staff Challenging Grade-Wise Seniority in Indian Navy. Promotion Policy Based on Combined Seniority Roster Upheld as Valid and Non-Discriminatory.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Artisan Staff of the Indian Navy challenging the common judgment of the Central Administrativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to CAT Order Quashing Dismissal of Naval Employee for Non-Service of Charge Sheet. Failure to Serve Charge Sheet at Correct Address Violates Natural Justice, Disciplinary Proceedings Vitiated.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India and naval authorities against a judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Addition of Defence Service as Qualifying Service for Pension — Ex-Serviceman Entitled to Count Military Service Under Rule 3 of KPTCL Pension Regulations, 1999.

The petitioner, Sri R. Hanumatha Singh, an ex-serviceman who served in the Indian Air Force from 31.01.1972 to 08.05.1987, later joined the Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Overtime Allowance on Revised Pay Scales - Computation Must Be Based on Revised Pay Scales Under Section 59 of Factories Act, 1948

The petitioners, initially appointed as Lower Division Clerks and later promoted as Upper Division Clerks at the Naval Armament Depot, were posted to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CAT Direction for Common Command Roster in Promotion Policy. Policy Matter Upheld as Reasonable and Not Arbitrary, CAT's Decision Affirmed.

The Union of India and others filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 28 June 2002 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reversion of Air Crew Diver in Coast Guard — Policy Change Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Vested Rights. The court held that the petitioner had a vested right to continue in the ACD cadre and the reversion order based on a retrospective policy was illegal.

The petitioner, Narendra Kumar Dabar, joined the Indian Coast Guard as a Navik on 3 January 1986. He successfully qualified for the Air Crew Diver (AC...