Search Results for "meeting agenda"

383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.4872 OF 2006

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus Against Panchayat for Non-Compliance with Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Prior Demand for Justice is Prerequisite; Agenda Need Only List Heads of Business, Not Every Detail, Under Sections 113-A and Meeting Rules.

The petitioners, residents of Anjuna, Bardez, Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the Village Panchayat ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Final Order in Writ Petition Challenging Minutes of Committee of Creditors Meeting under IBC, 2016. Key Issue Involved Adequacy of Notice under Section 24 and Natural Justice in Approval of Resolution Plan.

The writ petitioner, a suspended director of Associate Decor Limited (a company under corporate insolvency resolution process), challenged the minutes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Removal of Chairman in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute Over Redevelopment. Managing Committee Resolution and Deputy Registrar's Endorsement Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Bye-Laws Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The case involves a challenge by Madhavi Vilas Gosavi (Petitioner No.2) and another member (Petitioner No.1) against a resolution of the Managing Comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Scheme of Amalgamation Without Physical Meeting in Exceptional Circumstances. Section 110 of Companies Act, 2013 Does Not Eliminate Requirement of Meeting Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956 for Scheme Approval.

The judgment addresses a Company Summons for Direction filed by Godrej Industries Limited (GIL) seeking approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation with Wada...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003

The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Disqualification Order Against Woman Sarpanch for Failure to Hold Gram Sabha Meeting on Republic Day. Interpretation of Rule 3(2) of Gram Sabha Rules Indicates Meeting Date Not Mandatory, and Onus on Officials to Guide New Electee.

The petitioner, a Scheduled Tribe woman, was directly elected Sarpanch of village Mundgaon on 20.12.2022 and assumed office on 04.01.2023. Respondent ...