Search Results for "legal representatives substitution"

157 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 157 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules Appeal Does Not Abate if Estate is Sufficiently Represented.

This judgment concerns two connected civil appeals arising from suits for specific performance and eviction. In Civil Appeal No. 172 of 2026, the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pre-emption Case, Holding Limitation Runs from Each Sale Under Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act, 1966. Each Sale of Property Gives Fresh Cause of Action for Pre-emption, and Failure to Challenge Earlier Sales Does Not Bar the Right Under Article 97 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from a suit for pre-emption filed by the predecessor-in-interest of respondent No.1 (original plaintiff) against the appellant and ot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs and Grants Leave to Continue Proceedings in Specific Performance Suit. Transfer of Property During Pendency of Lis Pendens Does Not Affect Rights of Parties Under Order 22 Rule 4 and Rule 10 CPC.

The Plaintiff, Nirav Deepak Modi, filed Suit No. 1166 of 2006 for specific performance of an agreement for sale concerning a suit property. The suit w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Official Liquidator's Decision to Sell Company Assets as a Going Concern. Court Upholds Liquidator's Discretion Under Companies Act, 1956 to Reject Private Offers and Proceed with Public Auction for Maximizing Value.

The case involves a Company Appeal filed by the legal heirs of Umashankar Saraf and other family members against the Official Liquidator of M/s. Rai B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Abatement of Suit for Easement of Necessity. Failure to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Plaintiff Within Limitation Leads to Abatement of Entire Suit Under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs 1 to 4 and 6, along with Banubai Hariba Mohite (original plaintiff no.5), filed Regular Civil Suit No.278 of 1981...