2748
18 Jan 1966...
Search Results for "intra-state supply"
16 result(s) found
Found 16 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's Open Access Regulations in Challenge by Industrial Consumers. The Court held that the RERC has jurisdiction to regulate both intra-state and inter-state open access, and the restrictions imposed are reasonable and within the statutory framework of the Electricity Act, 2003.
1 Apr 2025The present appeals challenge two separate orders of the Rajasthan High Court upholding the validity of the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commissio...
- 604
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.
20 Mar 2018A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...
- 29
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.
9 Dec 2022The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...
- 231
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Levy of Entry Tax on Natural Gas Under Maharashtra Entry Tax Act, 2002 — Holds That Natural Gas Is Not 'Goods' for Entry Tax Purposes When Supplied Through Pipelines
27 Jul 2018The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by companies (Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd., Smartchem Technologies Ltd., Emp...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer Challenging Turnover Tax Assessment Under Karnataka Sales Tax Act. Levy of turnover tax on total turnover including interstate sales for classification purposes is constitutionally valid and does not exceed legislative competence.
28 Mar 2019The appellant, M/s. Achal Industries, a manufacturer and registered dealer of cashew kernels and cashew shell oil, was assessed for turnover tax under...
- 152
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition by State Transmission Utility and Load Dispatch Centre Against Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's Order Striking Down a Condition in Open Access Clearance. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission held that Regulation prevails over administrative condition, but State Load Dispatch Centre argues its statutory function under Sections 31 and 32 of Electricity Act, 2003 is being overridden.
22 May 2023The writ petition was filed by the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation (KPTCL) and the State Load Dispatch Centre (SLDC) under Articles 226 and 2...
- 19
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee in Standby Charges Dispute with Another Licensee — Standby Charges Fixed by Government Order and Principles of Agreement Held Binding. The court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's order that TPC could not recover standby charges beyond Rs.3.5 crores per month from BSES/REL for the 275 MVA facility, as per the Government of Maharashtra's order dated 19.1.1998 and the Principles of Agreement dated 30.1.1998.
2 May 2019The case involves a dispute between Tata Power Company Ltd. (TPC), a distribution licensee supplying electricity to the entire city of Mumbai, and Ada...
- 185
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Jurisdictional Clash Between Forward Markets Commission and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Over Electricity Futures Trading. The Court Considered Whether the Electricity Act, 2003 Overrides the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, and Whether the Power Market Regulations 2010 Framed by CERC Were Ultra Vires.
7 Feb 2011The matter involved two writ petitions being heard together by the Bombay High Court, arising from a jurisdictional conflict between two regulatory bo...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.
12 Mar 2019The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...
- 45
