Search Results for "intermediary liability"

108 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Amended IT Rule 3(1)(b)(v) as Unconstitutional — Majority Opinion Holds Rule Violates Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

The batch of writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity of the amendment dated 6th April 2023 to Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of the Information Technol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition to Quash FIR Against Intermediary in Alleged Fraud. Petitioner Alleged to be Mere Intermediary Between Complainant Company and UK-Based Supplier in International Sales Contract.

The petitioner, Govindaraja, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Letter of Credit Dispute in Common Judgment for Two Suits Arising from Alleged Discrepant Documents. Bank's Liability for Wrongful Debit Examined Under UCP 290 with Emphasis on Strict Compliance and Discrepancy in Shipping Documents.

Two suits were filed arising from a documentary import Letter of Credit facility granted by State Bank of India to Dadlani Silk Stores. Suit No. 1012 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Applications to Vacate Arrest of Vessels in Bunker Supply Disputes Involving Insolvent Intermediary. Maritime Claim for Bunkers Supplied to Vessel Held Enforceable In Rem Despite Lack of Privity Between Supplier and Owner.

The High Court of Bombay heard two notices of motion filed by the defendants in two admiralty suits seeking to vacate the arrest of their vessels. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Recovery of $300,000 in Commercial Contract Dispute. Zee Entertainment's claim for payment under a content licensing agreement upheld against Triller Inc for failure to make payment despite repeated demands.

The plaintiff, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, a public listed company, filed a summary suit in the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Cour...