Search Results for "in-house dispute resolution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "in-house dispute resolution"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 11 Application in Arbitration Act for Lack of Arbitration Clause in Government Contract. In-House Dispute Resolution Clauses Providing for Engineer's Decisions Held Not to Constitute Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Jul 2013

The applicant, a proprietary concern, entered into a tender contract with the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, a government body. The cont...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Rejects Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act Due to Premature Invocation of Two-Tier Dispute Resolution Clause. The Applicant Failed to First Exhaust the Decision of the Five-Member Committee as Mandated by Clause 21 of the Agreement, Rendering the Application Not Maintainable.

5 Jul 2013

The Miscellaneous Civil Application (Arbitration) No. 920/2012 was filed by The Akola Pravasi Va Malvahtuk Sahakari Sanstah Maryadit, Akola, a coopera...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Oct 2012

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cooperative Housing Dispute — Upholds Cooperative Court's Order for Transfer of Flat. Transfer of share and interest in a tenant co-partnership society requires compliance with by-laws and rules; society cannot refuse transfer without valid reason.

4 Sep 2014

The Petitioner, Smt. Geeta Narayan Parvati, was a lecturer and member of Respondent No.2 Society, a tenant co-partnership society registered under the...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Group of Writ Petitions by University Employees. No adjudicative details available in the provided text.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction Against Newspaper in Defamation Suit. Court Restrains Publication of Defamatory Articles About Plaintiff and Family Pending Trial, Holding That Per Se Defamatory Statements Without Justification Cannot Be Published.

10 Oct 2014

The plaintiff, Gokulchand Govindlal Sananda, filed Regular Civil Suit No.17 of 2013 seeking damages of Rs.25,00,000 for per se defamatory publications...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)