High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of Writ Petition (L) No. 30829 of 2024. The petition involved multiple parties including the State of Maharashtra and several private respondents.
8 May 2025...
Search Results for "hutment dwellers"
81 result(s) found
Found 81 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes SRA Acquisition Notice for Church Land, Upholds Owner's Preferential Right to Redevelop Slum. The Court held that the owner of slum land has a preferential right to redevelop the land under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority cannot acquire the land for a private developer without considering the owner's proposal.
11 Jun 2024The petitioner, a public trust managing Mount Mary's Church in Bandra, Mumbai, owned land admeasuring 9371.30 sq. meters, out of which 1596.40 sq. met...
- 502
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. AGRC's order directing SRA to decide on eligibility of slum dwellers for rehabilitation based on cut-off date upheld as valid exercise of appellate jurisdiction under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.
2 Apr 2024The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Sateri Builders and Developers LLP (the Developer) and Shree Gurukrupa (SRA) Co-operative Ho...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Order in Slum Rehabilitation Case. AGRC's Reversal of Developer Termination Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice.
29 Apr 2021The petitioner, Hanuman Nagar (Jogeshwari) SRA CHS (Proposed), is a society of slum dwellers residing on a plot in Jogeshwari, Mumbai. In 2006, the ma...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Grant of Scheme to Another Developer. Court upholds SRA's decision based on eligibility criteria and policy, finding no arbitrariness or violation of principles of natural justice.
22 Dec 2020The Petitioners, Dyna Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a developer) and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (a proposed cooperative society of...
- 33
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 2987 OF 2018
3 Jun 2019The judgment, rendered on 3 June 2019 by Justice G.S. Kulkarni of the Bombay High Court, was a writ petition concerning a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme o...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging High Power Committee's Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Dispute. The Court Upholds the Committee's Power Under Section 3B(3) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, to Direct Clubbing of Overlapping Schemes and Conduct Fresh Survey of Eligible Slum Dwellers.
9 Jul 2015The case involves a group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from a dispute over a slum rehabilitation scheme under the Maharashtr...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.
11 Jun 2014The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...
- 17
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes State Government's Cancellation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Approvals and Directs Fresh Hearing. Inconsistencies Between Government Directives and SRA Circular Were Not Established, and Scheme Was Permitted Under New Housing Policy of 2007.
24 Sep 2013The petitioner, a developer, submitted a proposal for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme which was in the nature of a Township Development Scheme for approx...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).
28 Jan 2011The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...
- 105
