High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of Writ Petition (L) No. 30829 of 2024. The petition involved multiple parties including the State of Maharashtra and several private respondents.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 85
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 30829 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (05) 45

WP(L) No. 30829 of 2024

2025-05-08

R. I. Chagla, J.

Cherag Balsara, Prathmesh Seth, Joseph Fernandes for Petitioners; Nishigandh Patil for Respondent No.1; Jyoti V. Mhatre, Anuja Tirmali, Komal Punjabi for Respondent No.2; Vineet Naik, Senior Counsel with Vishwanath Patil and Kedar Nhavkar for Respondent No.3; J. G. Aradwad (Reddy) for Respondent No.4; Mayur Khandeparkar, Rahul Arora, Krutika Pokale, Preeti Limbachiya, Jeet Gandhi for Respondent No.5; Anil Singh, Senior Counsel with Amogh Singh, Adarsh Vyas, Ruchita Verma, Rama Gupta, Akash Gupta for Respondent Nos.6 and 7; Yuvraj Narvankar, Raufa Shaikh for Respondent No.8

Ashok Kumar Gupta & Ors.

State of Maharashtra through the office of the Govt. Pleader, High Court, Bombay & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitration Awards — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings. The court affirmed that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract was reasonable and did not warrant interference.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Charter Party Agreement — No Binding Contract Established. Citing lack of agreement on essential terms, the court found no enforceable contract existed under the Indian Arbitration Act, 194...