Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging High Power Committee's Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Dispute. The Court Upholds the Committee's Power Under Section 3B(3) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, to Direct Clubbing of Overlapping Schemes and Conduct Fresh Survey of Eligible Slum Dwellers.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from a dispute over a slum rehabilitation scheme under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971. The petitioners, cooperative housing societies and developers, had their scheme originally approved by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority. However, the High Power Committee, acting on complaints from a rival cooperative society and an individual, passed an order clubbing the petitioners' scheme with another overlapping scheme and directed a fresh survey of eligible slum dwellers. The petitioners challenged this order, alleging that the High Power Committee exceeded its jurisdiction. The court heard the petitions together on 9th July 2015, with advocates for various parties present. The court noted that the real contesting respondent had earlier filed a complaint against one of the judges, but later withdrew it. The judgment provided factual background, noting that the scheme initially covered a certain area and number of slum dwellers, but was reduced due to reservation for a recreation ground. The eligibility of slum dwellers was disputed, leading to the impugned order. The court's oral judgment, delivered by Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari, was to finally dispose of the matters.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Power Committee under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, acted within its jurisdiction in passing the order dated 16.9.2013 directing clubbing of slum rehabilitation schemes and re-survey of eligible slum dwellers; Whether the order is arbitrary or in violation of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (07) 70

Writ Petition No. 2575 of 2013 along with Writ Petition No. 2745 of 2013, Writ Petition No. 1371 of 2014, and Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 3048 of 2014

2015-07-09

S.C. Dharmadhikari, G.S. Kulkarni

2015:BHC-OS:8626-DB

Prasad Dhakephalkar, Niranjan Lapasiya, Chirag Shah, A.R. Pai, Sanjeev Punalekar, D.A. Nalawade, Bharat Mehta, U.S. Tiwari, J.S. Saluja, Vijay Patil, Jacob Kadanott, Chirag Balsara, Leena Shah, Nikita Gade, Virendra Ichalkaranjikar, Parvinder Singh Sethi

Indian Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors., PNR Builders & Developers & Anr., Chembur Ayodhya Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) & Anr.

State of Maharashtra & Ors., Slum Rehabilitation Authority, High Power Committee, Chembur Ayodhya Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed), Santosh A. Sahu, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the order of the High Power Committee dated 16.9.2013 regarding clubbing of slum rehabilitation schemes and the eligibility list of slum dwellers.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the High Power Committee's order and restore the original approval of their scheme.

Filing Reason

The High Power Committee directed clubbing of the petitioners' slum scheme with another overlapping scheme and ordered a fresh survey, which the petitioners claimed was beyond jurisdiction and without basis.

Previous Decisions

The Slum Rehabilitation Authority had approved the scheme initially; the High Power Committee then issued the impugned order.

Issues

Whether the High Power Committee had jurisdiction to pass the order dated 16.9.2013 directing clubbing and re-survey. Whether the impugned order suffered from procedural impropriety or perversity.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners contended that the High Power Committee exceeded its statutory authority and that the original scheme had majority support. Respondents argued that the scheme overlapped with another, was not implemented properly, and the High Power Committee acted within its powers.

Judgment Excerpts

All these petitions are heard together and can be conveniently disposed of by a common judgment. Writ Petition No.2575 of 2013 is filed by the Cooperative Societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act,1960. The core issue is whether the High Power Committee has exceeded its jurisdiction in passing the impugned order dated 16.9.2013.

Procedural History

Petitioners' slum rehabilitation scheme was initially approved by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority. In 2008, a complaint was filed before the High Power Committee, leading to the impugned order dated 16.9.2013. The petitioners then filed multiple writ petitions challenging this order. During the pendency, one of the respondents filed a complaint against a judge, which was later withdrawn. The Bombay High Court heard the petitions together on 9th July 2015 and delivered an oral judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971:
  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Workmen's Compensation Case — Appellant Injured in Course of Employment Entitled to Increased Award with Interest. The court held that the appellant is entitled to enhanced compensation ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging High Power Committee's Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Dispute. The Court Upholds the Committee's Power Under Section 3B(3) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, to Direct Clubbing of Over...