Search Results for "export time limit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "export time limit"

328 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Notification No.23/2008-Customs as Ultra Vires Section 74(2) of Customs Act, 1962 — Challenge Becomes Academic as Consignments Exported Beyond Statutory Period. The petitioner's claim for duty drawback was rejected as the goods were placed under customs control for re-export only after 32-34 months, exceeding the two-year limit under Section 74(1)(iii)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962.

25 Mar 2025

The writ petitions sought a declaration that Notification No.23/2008-Customs dated 01.03.2008 was ultra vires Section 74(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Rebate Claim as Time-Barred Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act — Export Date Determines Limitation Period, Filing of ARE-1 Not a Substitute for Rebate Claim.

29 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Everest Flavours Ltd., exported a consignment of 360 drums containing Menthol Crystals to Bangkok on 12 February 2006. The shipping bi...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Customs Appeals on Domestic Clearance of Duty-Free Input Products Under Advance Authorizations. Core Issue Whether Tribunal Correctly Interpreted Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 Paras 4.1.3 and 4.1.5 to Permit Domestic Sales Before Export Obligation Fulfillment.

27 Oct 2016

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a batch of 17 customs appeals filed by various companies and individuals against three Commissioners of C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Duty Credit Under Target Plus Scheme — Export House Entitled to Benefit Despite Non-Specification of Input-Output Norms. The court held that the Target Plus Scheme does not require the exported product to be covered by Standard Input-Output Norms (SION) and the denial was arbitrary.

14 Jun 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Essel Mining & Industries Ltd., an Export House recognized by the Director General of Foreign Trade, engaged in the manufacture o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of TUFS Guidelines and Export Obligation Extension Policy. Court upholds Textile Commissioner's power to impose conditions for extension of export obligation period under Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS) and holds that guidelines are not ultra vires the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by textile exporters challenging the validity of guidelines issued by the Textile Commissioner under t...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Department's Appeal in Customs DFIA Scheme Conversion Case. Circular No.36/2010 Held Directory, Not Mandatory, Allowing Amendment of Shipping Bills Beyond Time Limit.

10 Apr 2026

The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Export) against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of DFIA Application for Maize Starch Powder Export. Court holds that the product 'Maize Starch Powder' is not covered under SION entry E75 which specifies 'Maize Starch', and the petitioner failed to comply with the requirement of submitting proof of export within the prescribed time limit under the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in export business, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of its appli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Central Excise Appeal Limitation Case — Commissioner (Appeals) Has No Power to Condon Delay Beyond 60 Days Under Section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944. Appeal filed beyond 90 days from order date cannot be entertained.

13 Oct 2005

The petitioner, M/s Sheetal Enterprises, a manufacturer of industrial lubricants, availed benefit of Nil rate of duty for export under Rules 13 and 14...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Kerala General Sales Tax Exemption Dispute Over Approval Date Interpretation. Exemption Period for 100% Export-Oriented Unit Held to Commence from Date of Unambiguous Central Government Approval (27.10.1994) Under SRO 1727/1993, Not from Production Start Date.

2 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the interpretation of an exemption notification under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. The dispute inv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Transitional Input Tax Credit Under GST — Time Limit for Filing TRAN-1 Form Held Directory, Not Mandatory. The court directed the GST authorities to accept the TRAN-1 Form filed beyond the prescribed time limit, holding that the time limit was directory and the petitioner had sufficient cause for delay.

20 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Nelco Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, supplies and undertakes various network-related services. It file...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)