Search Results for "exemption under Section 88B"

19 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Quashing Exemption Certificate Under Section 88-B of Bombay Tenancy Act. Trust Not Registered on Tillers Day Cannot Claim Exemption; Tenants' Rights Vest on 1st April 1957.

The petitioners, tenants of agricultural lands owned by a public trust, challenged a certificate of exemption granted under Section 88-B of the Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Exemption Certificate Under Section 88-B of Bombay Tenancy Act. Land Belonging to Public Trust Held Exempt from Tenancy Provisions as Trust Land Used for Religious and Charitable Purposes.

The petitioner, Yadu Dagadu Amrale (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition in Tenancy Exemption Case — Notice and Revision Rights Upheld. Tenants Entitled to Notice Under Section 88B of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1946 and Revision Lies Against Certificate Grant.

The petitioners, claiming to be tenants of agricultural land, challenged an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 16 August 1993 which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Order, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Waqf Property. Court holds that Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain suit regarding waqf property in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995.

The applicant, Linker Shelter Pvt. Ltd., filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on joint family property partition and limitation, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

The petitioners, who were members of a joint family, challenged an arbitral award passed in a partition dispute. The award had been made by an arbitra...