Search Results for "escalation claims"

267 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 267 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Suit for Recovery of Unpaid Amounts and Interest in Construction Contract Dispute. Holds that Delayed Payments Attract Interest Under Section 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Excess Recovery from Mobilisation Advance Must Be Refunded.

The plaintiff, M/s Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the Maharashtra State Police Housing & Welfare Corporation Ltd. for recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute, Upholds Plausible Contract Interpretation. High Court Exceeded Section 37 Jurisdiction by Substituting Its Own Construction of Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement.

The dispute arose from a Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement (CMDA) executed on 16.07.2008 between Parsa Kente Collieries Limited (appellant) and Rajas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Second Appeal in Land Acquisition, Enhances Compensation to Rs.3,00,000/- Per Acre Based on 10% Escalation. Interest Under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable Only From Date of Award, Following Supreme Court Precedent in Karigowda.

The case arose from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Mugabasava village, Bailhongal taluk, Belgaum District, for the Malaprabha Reservoir Proj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's rejection of escalation claim due to absence of escalation clause upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, M/s. Gulraj Engineering Construction Co., a registered partnership firm, challenged an arbitral award dated 14 January 2009 passed by...