Search Results for "countervailing duty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "countervailing duty"

55 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Antidumping Duty Gap Period Case. Tribunal's Decision That No Antidumping Duty Can Be Levied During Period Between Expiry of Provisional Duty and Imposition of Final Duty Under Rule 21 of Customs Tariff (Antidumping) Rules, 1995 Upheld.

15 Dec 2011

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed appeals against orders of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 1 Aug...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case - Cess Under Textile Committees Act Not Part of CVD. Cess under Section 5 of Textile Committees Act, 1963 is not includable in Countervailing Duty under Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 for exemption purposes.

2 Mar 2010

The appellant, M/s. Shree Rajasthan Texchem Limited, a manufacturer of yarn, imported capital goods (textile machinery) under bills of entry dated 28t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in CBI Case Due to Settlement Commission Immunity — Criminal Conspiracy and Corruption Charges Quashed Against Company Granted Immunity Under Central Excise Act, 1944 and Customs Act, 1962.

20 Sep 2024

The appellant, Baccarose Perfumes and Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing and exporting cosmetics from a unit in Kandla Spec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Safeguard Duty on Aluminum Foil Imports. Court upholds imposition of provisional safeguard duty under Section 8B of Customs Tariff Act, 1975, finding no violation of natural justice as petitioner was heard before final determination.

23 Jun 2023

The petitioner, P. G. Foils Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Customs Notification No.26/2009 dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Interest Demand on Customs Duty for Provisional Assessment Prior to Amendment. Interest under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962 cannot be levied retrospectively for period before its insertion when provisional assessment under Section 18 did not provide for interest.

10 Jan 2014

The petitioner, M/s. R. K. Chemicals, a proprietorship firm, imported a consignment of Mono Sodium Glutamate in 1996. There was a dispute regarding th...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Vessels Imported Prior to Notification. Condition No.82 of Notification 12/2012-Cus. Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Vessels Imported Before Its Effective Date.

5 Jan 2026

The petitioner, The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd., imported two vessels, 'Jag Rishi' and 'Jag Rahul', prior to 17.03.2012. On 17.03.2012, the Ce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Anti-Dumping Duty Recommendation on Flexible Slabstock Polyol from Saudi Arabia and UAE — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Failure to Consider Relevant Material. The Designated Authority's final findings dated 01.09.2020 were set aside for non-consideration of the petitioners' submissions and reliance on unsubstantiated data, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

6 Jan 2021

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the final findings dated 01.09.2020 of the D...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Labelling Activity Does Not Amount to Manufacture Under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Additional labelling on already marketable goods without enhancing marketability does not constitute manufacture, and extended period of limitation is applicable due to suppression of facts.

30 Apr 2024

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against an order of CESTAT which allowed the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Customs Mis-declaration Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invocable Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion. Importer's Mis-declaration for Claiming Notification Benefit Does Not Automatically Attract Penalty Under Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962.

22 Sep 2005

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Revenue) against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.

20 Mar 2018

A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)