Search Results for "co-owner consent"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Plaintiff's Prior Possession Established Despite Temporary Absence. Possession Through Tenant is Sufficient for Summary Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arises out of a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, concerning Plot No. 8 in the layout of Uruvila Cooperative Housing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award on termination and damages but modifies interest rate and clarifies that the builder is entitled to retain constructed area as per agreement.

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Abatement of Appeal in Rent Control Ejectment Suit. Failure to Bring Legal Representatives on Record Within Limitation Leads to Dismissal of Appeal as Abated.

The petitioners, heirs of the original plaintiff Ramsukh Mishrilal Jadiya, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 23/12/2010 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rent Controller's Permission to Evict Tenant for Arrears of Rent but Rejects Habitual Defaulter Ground. Landlord's claim for habitual default fails due to lack of specific pleading and proof under clause 13(3)(ii) of C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The landlord, Ganesh Tukaram Lonkar, so...