Search Results for "clerical mistake correction"

103 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Records Authority's Order Amending Consolidation Scheme After 47 Years for Being Unreasonable. Exercise of Power Under Section 31A of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 Must Be Within Reasonable Time.

The Writ Petition was filed by agriculturists of Village Shene challenging the order dated 14.08.2008 passed by the Superintendent of Land Records, Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Correction in Land Records — Correction of Survey Numbers in Mutation Entries Does Not Require Notice to Parties Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Jibhau Sukhdev Deore and others, filed a writ petition challenging the correction of survey numbers in mutation entries by the revenu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of 50-Year Delay in Land Revenue Appeal — Unreasonable Delay Not Explained. Superintendent of Land Records lacked jurisdiction to condone inordinate delay under Section 247 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 without proper cause.

The case involves a writ petition filed by M/s. Aluwid Architectural Private Ltd and others (petitioners) challenging an order dated 6 September 2022 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Review Award in Land Acquisition Case — Review of Award Not Permitted Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Section 13A Only Allows Correction of Clerical or Arithmetical Mistakes Within Six Months, Not Substantive Review.

The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellants' land was acquired by a notification dated 23.0...