Search Results for "bus operators"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Aadhaar Enrolment Fraud Case — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Allegations of forgery and cheating under IPC Sections 465, 468, 469, 471, 420, 120-B read with 34 fail as complaint lacks specific details and essential ingredients.

The petitioner, Sri Naresh Kumar R.P., CEO of M/s Edurays India, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking qu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Bus Driver's Negligence Established by Preponderance of Probabilities. Non-examination of Pillion Rider Not Fatal to Claim Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 28 October 2011, when Sitaram, a senior government school teacher, was riding a motorcycle with a pillion rid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Transport Appellate Tribunal Order in Motor Vehicles Act Case — Lack of Jurisdiction to Review Own Orders. The Tribunal cannot review its own orders under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as no power of review is conferred by the Act or Rules.

The petitioners, who are private bus operators, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes RTA Order Rejecting Stage Carriage Permit Applications on Notified Routes — Remands for Fresh Consideration. RTA Must Independently Apply Mind and Not Merely Rely on Objections of State Transport Undertakings Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Sree Gajanana Motor Transport Company Limited, a stage carriage operator, applied for four stage carriage permits on routes including ...