Search Results for "article 19(1)(a)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "article 19(1)(a)"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restrains West Bengal Police from Obstructing CBFC-Certified Film Exhibition. State Cannot Act as Super-Censor Over Films Certified Under Cinematograph Act, 1952.

15 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Indibily Creative Pvt Ltd and its directors, produced a Bengali feature film titled 'Bhobishyoter Bhoot' (meaning 'future ghosts'), a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Directions Against Lawyers' Strikes in Uttarakhand — Lawyers Have No Right to Strike or Boycott Courts. The Court held that strikes by advocates interfere with administration of justice and access to justice, and that Bar Councils must take disciplinary action against such conduct.

28 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by the District Bar Association, Dehradun, challenging a High Court judgment that directed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging National Film Awards Regulations — Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) Requiring Film Format Release and CBFC Certification Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14 and Not Violative of Article 19(1)(a). The court held that the eligibility criteria for awards do not infringe freedom of speech and are rationally connected to the objective of promoting film art.

27 Jul 2006

The petitioners, Gaurav Ashwin Jani, Anand Patwardhan, and Simantini Dhuruv, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging Regulations 10...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Restraining TV Channels from Telecasting Personal Life Details in Right to Privacy Case. Court Held That Right to Privacy Under Article 21 Includes Right to Be Let Alone and Media Cannot Intrude Into Personal Life Without Consent.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Asha K., a software engineer by profession working at WIPRO, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBFC and FCAT Orders for Lack of Reasons in Film Certification — Directs Reconsideration of 'Beehad - the Ravine' Trailer, Songs, and Promos. Requirement of Recording Reasons Under Rule 22(8) and (9) of Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983 is a Mandatory Safeguard for Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

28 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Krishna Mishra (writer and director) and another (producer), challenged the certification orders of the Central Board of Film Certifi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of Assistant Town Planner for Facebook Post Critical of Democracy. Expression of Opinion on Social Media Protected Under Article 19(1)(a) of Constitution.

21 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Jayant Sarvottamrao Kharwadkar, was an Assistant Town Planner in the Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad, with 19 years of service and a...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition to Restrain Media from Telecasting Personal Life Details of Petitioner and Family Members — Right to Privacy Prevails Over Media Freedom in Matrimonial Dispute. The court held that the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution is paramount and the media cannot intrude into the personal life of an individual without consent, especially when the matter is sub judice.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioner, a Software Engineer by profession working at WIPRO, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Journalist for Alleged Hate Speech Under Sections 153A and 505 IPC — Tweet Criticizing Budget Allocation Not Constituting Promotion of Enmity Between Groups. Court held that criticism of government policy is protected speech under Article 19(1)(a) and does not attract penal provisions unless it incites violence or promotes enmity between groups.

17 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Rahul Sivasankar, a renowned journalist with over 25 years of experience, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of C...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Journalists' Plea Against Alleged Harassment by Special Investigation Team in Cyber Crime Case. The Court directed that reporters cannot be summoned frequently without specific reason and their electronic devices cannot be seized without following due process under BNSS, emphasizing the right to privacy and protection of journalistic sources as laid down in Manohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India.

4 Feb 2025

The case arose from writ petitions filed by various reporters of news channels and a criminal original petition seeking directions to restrain the Spe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Appointment Norms of Information Commissioners Under Right to Information Act, 2005 — Petitioner Alleges Vague Criteria and Lack of Judicial Expertise Violate Fundamental Rights. The Court Examines Whether Sections 12(5) and 15(5) Are Unconstitutional for Not Requiring Judicial Qualifications in Light of the Right to Information and Quasi-Judicial Functions.

1 Aug 2026

The petitioner, a public-spirited citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution directly before the Supreme Court, challenging t...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)