Search Results for "arbitrary exclusion"

779 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 779 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CBSE Class 10 Student to Appear for Compartment Exam Despite Missing Regular Exam Due to Medical Reasons. Clause 41.2 of CBSE Bye-laws restricting eligibility for compartment exam to only those who appeared in regular exam is struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, a 16-year-old girl student of Class 10, challenged Clause 41.2 of the CBSE Examination Bye-laws and a Circular dated 12.08.2020 which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners in Tender Exclusion Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by State. Exclusion from tender for school uniform cloth procurement set aside as evaluation committee failed to consider petitioners' compliance with technical specifications.

The petitioners, Kanchan India Limited and Arvind Cotsyn India Limited, challenged their exclusion from a tender process issued by the Government of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Exclusion of Unaided Private School Students from National Means cum Merit Scholarship Scheme. Classification Between Government/Aided/Local Body Schools and Unaided Private Schools Held Reasonable and Not Violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Sri Sri Ravishankar Vidya Mandir, a recognized unaided private school in Osmanabad, challenged the validity of Note I of clause 3(d) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Lease for Delay in Hotel Construction Due to Economic Slowdown and Infrastructure Delays. Extension of Time Granted Without Additional Premium Under Agreement to Lease.

The petitioners, M/s. PVP Star Hotels Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Corrigendum Tender Notification in Food Supply Contract Dispute — Clause 4(C) Held Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Writ Petition Allowed as Corrigendum Imposed Unfair Condition Restricting Bidders Without Justification.

The petitioner, Rachappa S. Mannagi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...