Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, Rachappa S. Mannagi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad, challenging a corrigendum tender notification issued by the Karnataka State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited (2nd respondent). The corrigendum, bearing No. KFCSC/PROC/MSP/H&T/01/2025-26/1261 dated 10/10/2025, specifically clause 4(C), was alleged to be arbitrary and unreasonable. The petitioner sought quashing of the clause and a direction to the respondents to proceed with the tender without the impugned condition. The court, after hearing the counsel for the petitioner and the respondents, found that the condition imposed by clause 4(C) was arbitrary and lacked any rational basis, thereby violating the principles of fair competition in public procurement. The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the corrigendum to the extent of clause 4(C), and directed the respondents to proceed with the tender process in accordance with law, without the impugned condition.
Headnote
A) Constitutional Law - Judicial Review of Tender Conditions - Arbitrariness - Clause 4(C) of Corrigendum Tender Notification - The petitioner challenged clause 4(C) of the corrigendum dated 10/10/2025 issued by the Karnataka State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, which imposed a condition restricting bidders. The court held that the condition was arbitrary and unreasonable, as it lacked any rational basis and was contrary to the principles of fair competition in public procurement. The court quashed the clause, directing the respondents to proceed with the tender without the impugned condition. (Paras 1-3)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the corrigendum tender notification, specifically clause 4(C), issued by the 2nd respondent is arbitrary and liable to be quashed.
Final Decision
Writ petition allowed. The corrigendum tender notification bearing No. KFCSC/PROC/MSP/H&T/01/2025-26/1261 dated 10/10/2025, specifically clause 4(C), is quashed. The respondents are directed to proceed with the tender process in accordance with law, without the impugned clause.
Law Points
- Arbitrariness in tender conditions
- Judicial review of tender notifications
- Reasonableness in public procurement
- Mandamus for quashing arbitrary clauses



