Search Results for "Withholding Increments"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Punishment of Withholding Increments Without Departmental Enquiry. Punishment of permanently withholding two increments is a major penalty requiring a formal departmental enquiry under service rules.

The petitioner, Narendra s/o Motiram Bodkhe, a government servant, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Service Matter Challenging Withholding of Increments Without Enquiry. Major Penalty of Permanently Withholding Increments Requires Departmental Enquiry Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Narendra Motiram Bodkhe, an employee of Zilla Parishad, Wardha, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Restores Pension Benefits After 27-Year Increment Mistake. Petitioner secures favorable ruling on pension recalculations and additional benefits after wrongful withdrawal of increments granted for past service.

The petitioner, a Junior Hindi Stenographer, was employed with the Madhya Pradesh Government from 1977 to 1985 and later joined the respondent employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Interpretation of Increment Withholding Order as Major Penalty. Withholding of increment without cumulative effect is a minor penalty, not a major penalty.

The petitioners, Dr. Nilkanth Dhyanoba Jogdande and Dr. Eknath Rambhau Patil, retired employees of Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Modification of Dismissal to Withholding of Increments in Hospital Employee Misconduct Case. Labour Court's Power Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to Alter Disproportionate Punishment Upheld, Denial of Back Wages Affirmed.

The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from an award dated 10 May 2011 passed by the Labour Court in Reference (IDA) No. 107 of 2008. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Corporation Against Reduction of Punishment in Disciplinary Case — Withholding of Increments with Cumulative Effect Held Disproportionate for Unauthorized Absence by Junior Assistant.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by M/s Karnataka Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (the appellant) against an order dated 05.08.2024 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition in Disciplinary Proceeding Against Government Employee for Unauthorized Absence. Penalty of Withholding One Increment for One Year Upheld as Proportionate for Misconduct Involving Absence Without Permission and Verbal Altercation with Manager.

The State of Maharashtra and its officers filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, dated ...