Search Results for "Waluj Notified Area"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notification for Growth Center in Waluj Notified Area.

Four writ petitions were filed challenging the acquisition proceedings initiated by a notification dated 1st December 2010 under Section 126(4) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to CIDCO's Demand for Premium on Additional FSI in Waluj Growth Centre; Petitioners Argue Sanctioned DCR Provides Basic FSI of 1.5 and No Premium is Chargeable, While CIDCO Contends Unauthorized Construction and Suppression of Facts

The petitioners, three individuals engaged in business, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging communication...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in DMICDC Project — Upholds Right of Tenderer to Withdraw Before Acceptance Under Section 5 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The Government of India envisaged the development of the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMICDC), a large infrastructure project covering approximat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conversion of Open Space to Commercial Plot by MIDC — Violation of Public Trust and Statutory Procedure. Allotment of Reserved Open Space Without Following Section 14 of MIDC Act and Without Public Auction is Illegal.

The petitioners, residents of Waluj Industrial Area, Aurangabad, and one of them being an industrial unit holder, challenged the action of the Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Departmental Promotion Committee Recommendations in Postal Department Recruitment. Court Holds That Candidates Who Were Not Considered for Promotion Due to Non-Inclusion of Their Names in the Zone of Consideration Must Be Considered Afresh.

The petitioners, a group of 86 individuals employed in various capacities such as Postal Assistant, Sorting Assistant, Postman, and Mail Guard in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Water Cess Levy on Industrial Groundwater Use. Levy under Section 12 of Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976 is compensatory and regulatory, not a tax, and validly imposed on industries drawing groundwater for commercial purposes.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by industrial companies—BILT Graphic Paper Products Ltd., UltraTech CemCo Ltd., and Associated Ceme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MIDC to Distinguish Water Usage for Manufacturing vs. Allied Activities in Levy of Water Charges. The court held that MIDC cannot levy uniform higher water charges on industrial units without distinguishing between water used as raw material and water used for allied activities.

The petitioner, United Breweries Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging demand notices, water bills...