Search Results for "Uttar Pradesh Cane Service Rules"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to State Notification Fixing Sugarcane Price Despite Central FRP Under Essential Commodities Act. Section 6 of the EC Act Grants Overriding Effect to Central Orders Over Inconsistent State Enactments.

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the state government's notification fixing sugarcane price and the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Pension Grant to Scheme Employees Under Uttar Pradesh Cane Service Rules. Employees of Antar Gramin Sadak Nirman Yojana Held Entitled to Pension and Retiral Benefits as Per Government Decisions and Precedent in Vinod Kumar Goel.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 18.05.2016, which held that employees appointed under the Antar Gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Headmistress for Lack of Prior Approval Under Rule 35(2) of MEPS Rules, 1981. Management's failure to obtain prior approval from Education Officer renders suspension order invalid from inception.

The petitioner, Geeta Ganpatrao Suryawanshi, was employed as Headmistress at Shraddheya Mahila Bahuudeshiya Sanstha. On 12.05.2011, she was suspended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Search Committee Appointment for Vice Chancellor of Pune University. UGC Regulations, 2010 Held Directory, Not Mandatory, for Appointment Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Suresh Patilkhede challenging the appointment of the Search Committee for recommending a panel for ...