Search Results for "Upadhyaksha"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Upadhyaksha"

36 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President Despite Pending Disqualification Proceedings. No Statutory Bar Exists Under Section 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 for Moving No-Confidence Motion During Pendency of Disqualification Proceedings.

13 Jun 2024

The appellant, P. Reethi Mune Gowda, was the President of Bagaluru Grama Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against her by several members of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notification for Gram Panchayats Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Rotation Policy. Failure to Follow Section 161 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 and Rule 3 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1997 Rendered the Impugned List Invalid.

3 Jul 2023

The petitioners, Durgappa and Sharanamma, were Presidents of Bappur Gram Panchayat and Tidigol Gram Panchayat respectively. They filed a writ petition...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grama Panchayat Delimitation Notification — No Violation of Natural Justice Found in Final Notification Process. Delimitation of Wards Under Section 5 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is a Legislative Function Not Requiring Hearing Before Final Notification.

20 Sep 2021

The petitioners, residents of various Grama Panchayats in Mangaluru Taluk, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of No-Confidence Motion Rules Under Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. Rule 3(1), 3(2), and 3(4) of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayath) Rules, 1994 held intra vires the parent Act.

19 Dec 2019

The petitioner, B.R. Siddaramu, was the Upadhyaksha (Vice President) of Gollahalli Grama Panchayat. He was aggrieved by a notice dated 26.08.2019 issu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Comply with Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence Against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court held that the requirement of specifying the date of meeting in the notice is mandatory, and non-compliance renders the motion void.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. A notice of no-confidence motion was given by 14 members of the Gram Panchayat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Specify Meeting Date and Time Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory requirement of specifying date and time in the notice was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion invalid.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. Certain members of the Gram Panchayat issued a notice of no-confidence motion ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Motion signed by only 9 members instead of the required 10, and notice period of 15 days not provided.

28 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Smt. Roopa, was the President of Honnenahalli Gram Panchayat. The respondents 5 to 14, who were members of the Panchayat, moved a no-c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Vice President of Gram Panchayat. Rejection of nomination on ground of non-production of caste certificate held arbitrary under Article 226 of the Constitution.

7 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Yasmeen, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Gonikoppa, in the election held on 20.4.2016. Subsequently, a notice was issu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Temporary Injunction Restraining Gram Panchayat President in Election Dispute — Rule 14 of Karnataka Panchayath Raj (Election of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayath) Rules, 1995 Bars Civil Court from Granting Injunction in Election Matters.

3 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Sri Malappa, was elected as President of Vatadahosahalli Gram Panchayat following elections held on 2 June 2015 under the Karnataka Pa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals Challenging Election of Members of Gurupura Grama Panchayat — No Interference Under Article 226 of Constitution of India in Election Disputes After Declaration of Results. The court held that once the election process is over and results are declared, the only remedy is an election petition under the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, and no interference under Article 226 is warranted.

6 Aug 2015

The case pertains to a dispute regarding the election of members of Gurupura Grama Panchayat in Mangaluru Taluk, Dakshina Kannada. The appellants, Smt...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)