High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grama Panchayat Delimitation Notification — No Violation of Natural Justice Found in Final Notification Process. Delimitation of Wards Under Section 5 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is a Legislative Function Not Requiring Hearing Before Final Notification.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, residents of various Grama Panchayats in Mangaluru Taluk, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the final notification dated 30.11.2020 issued by the Karnataka State Election Commission delimiting wards of Grama Panchayats. The petitioners contended that the final notification was issued without providing them an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. They also argued that the delimitation was arbitrary and not in accordance with the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The respondents, including the State of Karnataka and the Election Commission, opposed the petition, stating that the draft notification was published, objections were invited, and after considering objections, the final notification was issued. The court examined Section 5 of the Act and relevant rules, noting that the process of delimitation is a legislative function. The court observed that the Act does not require a hearing before issuance of the final notification; the only requirement is publication of draft notification and consideration of objections. Since the petitioners did not file objections to the draft notification, they could not complain of violation of natural justice. The court dismissed the petition, holding that the final notification was valid and no interference was warranted.

Headnote

A) Panchayat Raj - Delimitation of Wards - Final Notification - Natural Justice - Section 5 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Petitioners challenged final notification of delimitation of wards of Grama Panchayats on ground that no opportunity of hearing was given before issuance of final notification - Court held that the Act does not mandate any hearing before issuance of final notification; the process of delimitation is a legislative function and not quasi-judicial - Petitioners had opportunity to file objections to draft notification but did not avail - Held that final notification cannot be challenged on ground of violation of natural justice (Paras 8-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the final notification of delimitation of wards of Grama Panchayats issued under Section 5 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is vitiated for want of opportunity of hearing to the petitioners before its issuance.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed. The final notification of delimitation is upheld. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • delimitation of constituencies
  • final notification
  • opportunity of hearing
  • Section 5 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act
  • 1993
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (KAR) (09) 22

Writ Petition No.1506/2021 (LB- RES)

2021-09-20

M. Nagaprasanna

Sri Anandarama K. for petitioners; Smt. Prathima Honnapura for R1 and R2; Sri K.N.Phanindra, Sr. Counsel for Smt. Vaishali Hegde for R3; Sri K.Chandranath Ariga for R9, R12 and R15; Sri A.K.Vasanth for R16

Sri Ravi and Sri Ramakrishna K. Pattori

State of Karnataka, Deputy Commissioner, Karnataka State Election Commission, Konaje Grama Panchayat, Bala Grama Panchayat, Yedapadavu Grama Panchayat, Badaga Yedapadavu Grama Panchayat, Kuppepadavu Grama Panchayat, Ekkaru Grama Panchayat, Athikaribettu Grama Panchayat, Thalapady Grama Panchayat, Malluru Grama Panchayat, Kinya Grama Panchayat, Manjanadi Grama Panchayat, Jokatte Grama Panchayat, Paduperaru Grama Panchayat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging final notification of delimitation of wards of Grama Panchayats.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of final notification dated 30.11.2020 and direction to provide opportunity of hearing before finalizing delimitation.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that final notification was issued without giving them an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the final notification of delimitation of wards is vitiated for want of opportunity of hearing? Whether the delimitation process under Section 5 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 requires a hearing before issuance of final notification?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that no opportunity of hearing was given before issuance of final notification, violating natural justice. Respondents argued that draft notification was published, objections were invited, and after considering objections, final notification was issued; no hearing is required under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The process of delimitation of wards under Section 5 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is a legislative function. The Act does not mandate a hearing before issuance of the final notification. The only requirement is publication of draft notification and consideration of objections. Since petitioners did not file objections to the draft notification, they cannot claim violation of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The Act does not mandate any hearing before issuance of the final notification. The process of delimitation is a legislative function and not quasi-judicial.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India challenging final notification dated 30.11.2020. Heard and dismissed on 20.09.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: Section 5
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grama Panchayat Delimitation Notification — No Violation of Natural Justice Found in Final Notification Process. Delimitation of Wards Under Section 5 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Infanticide Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 IPC as Complainant's Testimony Was Inconsistent and...