Search Results for "Unutilized Land"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal Against SIPCOT Land Cancellation — Lease Clause 14(i) Requires Show Cause Notice Before Resumption of Unutilized Land. SIPCOT's cancellation of 3.70 acres without prior notice violates natural justice; order set aside and matter remitted for fresh consideration.

The appellant, Kems Forging Ltd (formerly Sri Lakshmi Industrial Forge and Engineers Ltd), was allotted an industrial plot by SIPCOT on 05.12.2005, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal by Lessee in Land Cancellation Case — SIPCOT's Resumption of Unutilized Land Upheld. Clause 14(i) of Lease Deed Permits Cancellation of Allotment for Non-Use; Appellant Failed to Prove Industrial Utilization of Excess Land.

The appellant, Kems Forging Ltd (formerly Sri Lakshmi Industrial Forge and Engineers Ltd), was allotted an industrial plot by SIPCOT on 05.12.2005, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Oath-Based Verification of Income Tax Demand. Petitioner's request for respondent to submit claim under oath rejected as not maintainable under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Prof. P.N. Shetty, filed a writ petition under Article 226 read with Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India, seeking direct...