Search Results for "Section 95A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 95A"

17 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Eviction Order Against 80-Year-Old Tenant in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Petitioner's Right to Alternate Accommodation Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Upheld as Board Failed to Provide Permanent Rehabilitation Before Eviction.

30 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sugrabai Gulam Abas Tambawala, an 80-year-old housewife, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

4 Jul 2012

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Tenants Against MHADA in Slum Rehabilitation Disputes — Held That Tenants in Possession Before Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by tenants against the Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) concerning slum rehabilitat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MBRRB Notices and Order in Bhendi Bazar Redevelopment Project. Court upholds validity of notices under Section 95A of MHAD Act and order appointing SBUT as developer, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

2 Jul 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by occupants of Sardharia Building in Bhendi Bazar, Mumbai, challenging actions of the Bombay Building ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Irani Chawl Structures as Unauthorized Construction. Court upholds demolition by Municipal Corporation under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, finding no violation of natural justice as notice was affixed and opportunity of hearing was given.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, residents of Irani Chawl, Prabhadevi, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their structures by the Municipal C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Suit Challenging MHADA Notice. The court held that the petitioner, a company, was not a necessary or proper party to the suit between tenants and MHADA and had no right to be impleaded.

6 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Orbit Corporate Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9-2-2012 pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes NOC Cancellation Order in MHADA Housing Dispute — Procedural Violation of Natural Justice. Board's Order Cancelling No Objection Certificate Set Aside as Passed Without Hearing Affected Parties, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

16 Sep 2005

The petitioners, Bharat Kanakia and Rajendra Shah, along with others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 16...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

23 Jun 2011

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Co-owner's Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Decree for Possession and Mesne Profits Upheld. Court holds that a co-owner in exclusive possession of joint family property is liable to pay mesne profits to other co-owners from the date of demand, and that the suit is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute over joint family property between co-owners. The original plaintiff, Rangnath Shivram Medankar (since deceased, represent...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)