Search Results for "Section 95-A MHADA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Section 95-A MHADA"

28 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Issues Judgment on Official Trustee's Petition Against MHADA Notice and Redevelopment Approvals — Matter Concerns Temple Property and Involves Heritage and Coastal Zone Regulations. The petition seeks setting aside of notice under Section 95-A of MHADA Act, building plans, and TDR certificate, while developer relies on Memorandum of Understanding and court orders.

6 Mar 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Order Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Against Non-Cooperative Members. Court Rules Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board Has Jurisdiction to Invoke Section 95A Under DCR 33(5) for Redevelopment of MHADA Layouts.

4 Feb 2010

The writ petition challenged an order of summary eviction under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, directed agains...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MBRRB Notices and Order in Bhendi Bazar Redevelopment Project. Court upholds validity of notices under Section 95A of MHAD Act and order appointing SBUT as developer, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

2 Jul 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by occupants of Sardharia Building in Bhendi Bazar, Mumbai, challenging actions of the Bombay Building ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Government Waiver of Cooperative Societies' NOC for MHADA Redevelopment. The impugned communication deleted the condition requiring consent of all 17 housing societies under Clause 7(b) of Regulation 33(5) of DCPR 2034 in the context of redevelopment of dilapidated buildings.

28 Jan 2026

Background: The case concerns the redevelopment of 17 residential buildings owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

23 Jun 2011

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

4 Jul 2012

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cooperative Society's Right to Develop Land in Siddharth Nagar, Rejects MHADA's Claim of Ownership. The court held that the cooperative society representing occupants of Patra chawls is entitled to development rights over 10 acres of land as per government resolution, and MHADA cannot unilaterally terminate the development agreement.

10 Feb 2011

The case involves a dispute over the development of land in Siddharth Nagar, Goregaon, Mumbai. The Bombay Housing and Area Development Board (now MHAD...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal of Society Members in Cooperative Redevelopment Dispute. Refusal of Interim Relief by Cooperative Court Not Perverse; Summary Eviction Order Under Section 95A of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 Upheld After Compliance With Natural Justice.

8 Aug 2011

The appellants, eight members of Goregaon Unnati Cooperative Housing Society, residing in chawls numbered 19, 20, 21 and 24, filed a dispute before th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Court upholds MHADA's order directing petitioners to vacate and hand over possession of chawl rooms for redevelopment under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

23 Oct 2023

The petitioners, who are residents of Mohamed Tajbhai Chawl in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)