Search Results for "Section 64(1)"

318 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 318 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows PIL Seeking Prevention of Cow Slaughter in Non-Designated Places During Bakrid. Court Holds That Slaughter of Cows and Calves Must Only Occur in Designated Slaughterhouses Under Article 48 of the Constitution and Tamil Nadu Animal Preservation Act.

The petitioner, K. Surya alias K. Surya Prasanth, a resident of Coimbatore and an activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals Seeking Mandamus Against Regulatory Authorities for Data Breach Complaint — No Statutory Duty Established Under IT Act or Insurance Laws.

The appellant, Himanshu Pathak, proprietor of CyberX9, filed six writ petitions before the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petition Seeking to Strike Off Plaint in Suit for Injunction Against Trust and Trustees. Court Holds That Suit Is Not Barred by Section 92 CPC as Plaintiffs Seek Declaration of Rights as Trustees and Perpetual Injunction, Not Reliefs Covered Under Section 92 CPC.

The case involves a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, by the defendants 1 to 7 in O.S. No.394 of 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows EPF Recovery Over Bank's Mortgage in Priority Dispute Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. EPF Dues Have Priority Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952.

The case involves three writ appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.15582 of 2010 and 8686 of 2010 dated 21.06.2011. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summoning Order Against Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Criminal conspiracy allegations under Section 120B IPC failed as no material showed meeting of minds between accused and main assailants.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by accused Nos. 6 and 7 in C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Uber's Appeal Against CCI Investigation Order for Alleged Abuse of Dominant Position Through Predatory Pricing. The Court held that information showing Uber incurred a loss of Rs.204 per trip was sufficient to form a prima facie case under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CBI Investigation in Bhima Koregaon Case — Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Not Required for CBI Officers. CBI Investigation Valid Under DSPE Act as Section 6A Struck Down by Supreme Court.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by individuals (Anant Pandurang Kale, Ashwini Kshirsagar, Naveen Kumar Rai and Siraj Razzak Bagwan, Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Govind s/o Maneji Vaidya, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the murder of his sister-in-law Yamunabai under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC set aside as sole witness's testimony was inconsistent and no independent corroboration existed.

The appellant, Farooq K. Khan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Section 392 read with Section 397 of...