Search Results for "Section 33(5) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Section 33(5) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act"

7 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion — Non-Service of Requisition Copy Not Fatal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Service of Notice Under Section 35 Read with Rule 2 of No-Confidence Rules Held Sufficient Compliance.

8 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Amrapali Sakharam Kamble, was elected as Sarpanch of Mhasrang Gram Panchayat on 26th February 2021. She remained absent from meet...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Procedural Irregularities in Notice Period and Meeting Conduct Render Motion Invalid. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 was not complied with, and the meeting was not conducted properly, thus quashing the no-confidence motion.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Indraraj Babulal Jaiswal and Sangitabai Laxman Shinde, were the Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch respectively of Grampanchayat Tembhurni....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sarpanch Election Result — Tick Mark on Ballot Paper Held Valid. Court upholds Additional Commissioner's finding that respondent no.4 received five votes, rejecting petitioner's claim of invalid vote under Section 33(5) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

14 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Meena Dilip Aware, and respondent no.4, Vaishali Kailas Kadu, were candidates for the post of Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Bhugaon. E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Having More Than Two Children Under Section 14(1)(j1) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Children from Both Marriages Counted Regardless of Divorce; Belated Application Does Not Bar Disqualification.

5 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Ashok Balasaheb Chaugule, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat of Tardal, Taluka Hatkanangale, District Kolhapur in 2007. Res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Disqualification Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Inquiry.

18 Aug 2010

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by members of the Gram Panchayat of village Krishna, challenging an order dated 23rd April 2010 passed ...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)