Search Results for "Section 29-E"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Section 29-E"

4 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Co-operative Society Resolution and Voter List for Violation of Bye-laws and Natural Justice. Resolution No. 10 and 13 dated 08/08/2025 and voter list quashed as 6th respondent was not a member of the 5th respondent society and thus ineligible to be a delegate.

26 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Shankar Gopalkrishna Bhat, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karn...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

23 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Co-operative Societies Election Dispute — Remaining Term of Office Computed from Date of Vacancy, Not Notification. Section 29-E of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 interpreted to mean that a director elected to fill a casual vacancy holds office only for the remainder of the original board's term, computed from the date the vacancy arose.

7 Feb 2018

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Karnataka Government Secretariat Co-operative Society Ltd. against an order of a Single Judge in Writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery in House Trespass Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Articles. The court applied the presumption under Section 114(a) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, that possession of recently stolen property leads to an inference of guilt, and found the chain of circumstances complete.

6 Sep 2011

The appellant, Raju Balaram Gujrathi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai, for offences under Sections...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)