High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Co-operative Societies Election Dispute — Remaining Term of Office Computed from Date of Vacancy, Not Notification. Section 29-E of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 interpreted to mean that a director elected to fill a casual vacancy holds office only for the remainder of the original board's term, computed from the date the vacancy arose.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Karnataka Government Secretariat Co-operative Society Ltd. against an order of a Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos.46944-46945/2017 dated 13.10.2017. The appellant society challenged the Single Judge's interpretation of Section 29-E of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 regarding the computation of the remaining term of office for a director elected to fill a casual vacancy. The respondents included the State of Karnataka, Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Joint Registrar, Co-operative Election Authority, Returning Officer, and two individuals (Sri S. Harish and Sri Abhijit S). The core legal issue was whether the 'remaining term of office of the board' under Section 29-E should be computed from the date the vacancy occurred or from the date of notification to fill the vacancy. The appellant argued that the term should run from the date of vacancy, while the respondents contended it should be from the date of notification. The Division Bench, comprising the Acting Chief Justice and Justice P.S. Dinesh Kumar, held that the remaining term must be computed from the date the vacancy arose, as the elected director merely fills the unexpired portion of the original board's term. The court reasoned that the language of Section 29-E, which states 'for the remaining term of office of the board,' clearly indicates that the term is tied to the original board's tenure, not the notification date. The court allowed the appeals, set aside the Single Judge's order, and directed that the election process be completed in accordance with this interpretation. The judgment emphasizes that the date of notification is irrelevant for determining the term length; the term is fixed by the vacancy date.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Societies - Election - Casual Vacancy - Section 29-E Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Interpretation - The court examined whether the 'remaining term of office of the board' for a director elected to fill a casual vacancy is computed from the date of vacancy or from the date of notification. Held that the term must be computed from the date the vacancy occurred, as the elected director steps into the shoes of the previous director and serves only the unexpired portion of the original board's term. (Paras 1-10)

B) Co-operative Societies - Election - Notification - Section 29-E Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - The court clarified that the date of notification to fill the vacancy is irrelevant for computing the remaining term; the term is fixed by the date of vacancy. The election process must be completed expeditiously, but the term of the elected director is limited to the remainder of the board's term from the vacancy date. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the 'remaining term of office of the board' referred to in Section 29-E of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 has to be computed from the date when the vacancy in the office of the director of the board occurred, or from the date of notification to fill the vacancy.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeals are allowed. The order dated 13.10.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos.46944-46945/2017 is set aside. The remaining term of office of the board under Section 29-E of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 is to be computed from the date when the vacancy in the office of the director occurred.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of statutes
  • Election law
  • Co-operative societies
  • Casual vacancy
  • Remaining term of office
  • Section 29-E Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1959
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (02) 33

Writ Appeal No.6399/2017 & Writ Appeal No.6448/2017 (CS-EL/M)

2018-02-07

H.G. Ramesh (Acting Chief Justice), P.S. Dinesh Kumar

Sri Y.R. Sadasiva Reddy (Senior Counsel for Sri Sahadeva Reddy D.N., Advocate) for appellant; Sri V. Sreenidhi (AGA for R1 to R5); Sri Vinayaka B (Advocate for C/R6 & R7)

Karnataka Government Secretariat Co-operative Society Ltd.

The State of Karnataka, Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Election Officer, The Co-operative Election Authority, The Returning Officer, Sri S. Harish, Sri Abhijit S

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Intra-court appeals against a Single Judge order in writ petitions concerning election to fill a casual vacancy in the board of a co-operative society.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to set aside the Single Judge's order dated 13.10.2017 in Writ Petition Nos.46944-46945/2017.

Filing Reason

Dispute over the interpretation of Section 29-E of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 regarding computation of the remaining term of office for a director elected to fill a casual vacancy.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka passed an order on 13.10.2017 in Writ Petition Nos.46944-46945/2017, which was challenged in these appeals.

Issues

Whether the 'remaining term of office of the board' under Section 29-E of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 is computed from the date of vacancy or from the date of notification to fill the vacancy.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the remaining term should be computed from the date the vacancy occurred. Respondents contended that the term should be computed from the date of notification to fill the vacancy.

Ratio Decidendi

The 'remaining term of office of the board' under Section 29-E of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 must be computed from the date the vacancy occurred, not from the date of notification to fill the vacancy. The elected director serves only the unexpired portion of the original board's term.

Judgment Excerpts

The question that requires to be examined in this case is, whether ‘the remaining term of office of the board’ referred to in Section 29-E of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 has to be computed from the date, when the vacancy in the office of the director of the board occurred, or from the date of notification to fill the vacancy? These intra Court appeals are filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 praying to set aside the order dated 13.10.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos.46944-46945/2017.

Procedural History

The appellant filed Writ Petition Nos.46944-46945/2017 before a Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka, which was dismissed by order dated 13.10.2017. Aggrieved, the appellant filed these intra-court appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961. The appeals were heard by a Division Bench on 07.02.2018 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959: Section 29-E
  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Service Matter — No Willful Disobedience Found as Accused Took Steps for Compliance. Compliance with Court Order Requires Reasonable Time and Admini...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Co-operative Societies Election Dispute — Remaining Term of Office Computed from Date of Vacancy, Not Notification. Section 29-E of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 interpreted to mean that a direc...