Search Results for "Section 24(2) of 2013 Act"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Lapsed as Compensation Was Deposited with Collector But Not Paid to Landowners, Failing Statutory Requirement.

The Supreme Court disposed of a bunch of appeals involving common questions of law and fact regarding land acquisition proceedings. The background inv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Finding. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act When Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation Due to Title Dispute.

The Supreme Court heard two appeals arising from a Delhi High Court order concerning land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1989-1992. The responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Does Not Lapse as Possession Was Taken, Applying Constitution Bench Interpretation That 'Or' in Section 24(2) Means 'Nor' or 'And', Overruling Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring the acquisition deemed to have lapsed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Overruling Precedent Based on Non-Payment Alone.

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 30.05.2016 by the High Court of Delhi, which allowed a writ petition and declared that land acquisiti...