Search Results for "Section 120(2)"

87 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rules on Reference Scope in Silver Confiscation Case Under Customs Act. Reference Question Limited to Silver Confiscated Under Section 120(2), Not Entire Seized Quantity.

The matter arose from a reference made by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) to the High Court of Bombay under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in PMLA Case for Lack of Scheduled Offence. Attachment of properties under Section 5(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 set aside as predicate offence was not a scheduled offence under PMLA.

The petitioners, Sunlight Housing Development Pvt. Ltd., Mukesh Doshi, Kaushal Doshi, and Mack Star Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Claim Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. High Court's reliance on overruled Pune Municipal Corporation decision renders declaration of lapse unsustainable.

The Government of NCT of Delhi and another appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which declared that the acquisition proceedings conce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal Against Quashing of Acquisition of Part of Building Without Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court Held That Acquisition of a Portion of a Building Without Acquiring the Land Beneath It is Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment of the High Court dated 10.3.2006 in two writ petitions filed by Reliance Industries Ltd. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Detention Orders for Lack of Proper Adjudication. Principles of Natural Justice Violated as Show Cause Notices Were Issued Without Considering Petitioner's Reply.

The petitioner, M/s. Vinod Metal and M/s. Vinod Steel, proprietorship and HUF concerns of Vinodkumar Velraj Mehta, filed multiple writ petitions under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute Over Hypothecated Assets. Court allows appointment of Receiver under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to preserve assets pending arbitration.

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...