Search Results for "Section 104(2) CPC"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when courts below have concurrently found that suit property is joint family property and plaintiff is entitled to share.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendants No.2 to 4 against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Latur, in Regul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reduces Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Comparability of Sale Deeds and Awards. Reference Court Erred in Relying on Ex.P-41 Without Examining Whether Lands Were Comparable.

The case involves an appeal by the Bijapur Urban Development Authority (BUDA) and a cross-objection by the claimants (landowners) against the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by Development Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Reduced from Rs.1,50,000 to Rs.1,20,000 per Acre. Comparable Sale Deed Method Upheld but Deduction for Development Reduced from 40% to 20% Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves an appeal by the Bijapur Urban Development Authority (BUDA) against the judgment of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bijapur, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property; Non-Examination of Attesting Witnesses to Sale Deed Led to Adverse Inference.

The legal representatives of the original plaintiff in O.S. No. 104/1982 (old No. 215/1968) filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Regular Appeal — Section 104(2) CPC Does Not Bar Appeal Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC Against Order Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Passed in a Regular Appeal.

The appellant, Sri Madhava Prabhu, filed Regular Appeal No.43/2015 before the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Udupi. In that appeal, he fil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement Despite Trial Commencement — Liberal Approach Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. Amendment Sought to Incorporate Alternative Plea of Ownership Based on Adverse Possession Not Barred by Delay or Lack of Due Diligence.

The petitioners, who were defendants in Regular Civil Suit No. 242/2007, filed an application (Exh. 42) for amendment of their written statement. The ...