Search Results for "SSLC requirement"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Rejection of Candidature Due to Unnotified Qualifying Marks for Kannada Language Test. Fixation of Minimum Qualifying Marks After Examination Concluded Violates Principles of Fairness and Transparency Under Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, a Junior Training Officer at Government ITI College, Dhulkhed, challenged the endorsement issued by respondent No.3 (General Manager (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Examination Board to Consider Promotion of Disabled Student Based on Preparatory Exam Marks. Student with Osteogenesis Imperfecta and 75% Disability Seeks Exemption from Final SSLC Examination.

The petitioner, Master Bharath S., a minor student aged 16 years, represented by his father, was studying in Standard X at Bharat Vidyaniketan School,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 10-Year Study Condition for NEET UG Eligibility in Karnataka State Quota — Condition Held Unreasonable and Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Alan Ryan Lobo, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Student's Admission in 3-Year Law Course Despite Open Schooling PUC. The court held that a student who passed PUC through correspondence/open schooling is eligible for admission if he had regular schooling up to SSLC.

The petitioner, Prasanna, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the approval list dated 3.11.2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award Directing Regularization of 24 Workmen in National Aerospace Laboratories — Workmen Held Not Entitled to Regularization as They Were Employed by Contractor, Not Principal Employer.

The petitioner, Management of National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL), challenged the award dated 30-12-2005 of the Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru in I....